Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do people think of this?
I think if he goes anywhere near any real soldiers he'll most likely get beaten up!
His wife is clearly delusional too
And surely this counts as "stolen valour"?
What a moron
View attachment 88457
I think any reasonable person who saw him sporting that tat would assume he was militarySince they're openly admitting that he didn't serve, I don't think it would be considered "stolen valor." I think that's if there's a deliberate attempt to defraud, for either financial or social gain.
Just like if someone has a Kansas City Chiefs hat, I wouldn't presume they're claiming to be an actual member of the team.
I don't assume anyone wearing an NBA jersey plays for the NBA.I think any reasonable person who saw him sporting that tat would assume he was military
Even if he doesn't actively go around telling people the tattoo does so passively
I think he is being dishonest and if I were a member of the military I'd be very annoyed
I think you may be correct.I think if he goes anywhere near any real soldiers he'll most likely get beaten up!
But the thing is, this guy seems to think he's some kind of serviceman because it's "in his heart" so he doesn't need to enlist, his wife even thinks she qualifies as an "army wife"I don't assume anyone wearing an NBA jersey plays for the NBA.
As one who has served in the Air Force, I don't assume anyone wearing a bomber jacket is a pilot.
The wife isn't even a wife, let alone and army wife.But the thing is, this guy seems to think he's some kind of serviceman because it's "in his heart" so he doesn't need to enlist, his wife even thinks she qualifies as an "army wife"
I think if one were to read in-between the lines here one could get the impression that they won't have him because he is too stupid, I think the "never went to school" bit gives the game awayThe wife isn't even a wife, let alone and army wife.
Nonetheless, he wants to enlist. The article doesn't give enough information about why he doesn't. Could be the "wife"...could be a medical condition...could be any number of things. We don't have enough information to be all judgy about this.
I think any reasonable person who saw him sporting that tat would assume he was military
Even if he doesn't actively go around telling people the tattoo does so passively
I think he is being dishonest and if I were a member of the military I'd be very annoyed
I don't understand what legitimate reason a person would have for such a tattoo other than as a badge of serviceA tattoo isn't necessarily viewed the same way as a uniform or rank insignia or medal that someone might wear to trick people. I recall a story from Florida where some veteran was mad at some panhandler claiming to be a veteran. The video was still on YouTube:
A tattoo is different, since it's not actually issued by the military. In the same way, someone might have a bumper sticker on their car for one of the services, but unless it specifically identifies as "veteran," then I wouldn't assume it means anything. I know someone who has a bumper sticker: "My son is in the Air Force."
Is the fact that he never went to school his fault? Or his parents? Would that make it his fault that he wants to enlist and can't?I think if one were to read in-between the lines here one could get the impression that they won't have him because he is too stupid, I think the "never went to school" bit gives the game away
Do you always pass judgment on people with such limited information? It makes me wonder what you might say about me behind my back.I think he is a simpleton who has unreasonable expectations and wants to be a big strong army man
How is that relevant to this topic? These people in the OP are pretty open about his not being Airborne.I was once in a psych ward and this stinking fat dullard wearing desert camouflage came in claiming to be a mercenary and ex-special forces. I humoured him and he was obviously stupid and a fantasist. Smelt terrible too, even I could have had him in a fight and that says a lot!
I don't understand what legitimate reason a person would have for such a tattoo other than as a badge of service
I don't think it's the same as having one of your favourite sports team
No, but it may make him unsuitable for what he wants to do if for instance he can't read which is something I can relate to, at school I was late to learn how to read and needed private lessonsIs the fact that he never went to school his fault? Or his parents? Would that make it his fault that he wants to enlist and can't?
I form tentative speculative opinions, yesDo you always pass judgment on people with such limited information? It makes me wonder what you might say about me behind my back.
Maybe, but as a civilian I'd never have such a tattoo, it would feel wrong and disrespectful and I'd worry about people taking it the wrong way and thinking I had bad motivesConceivably, one could have such a tattoo in honor of a friend or family member who served. Or they could just be a militarist who likes the military and wants to show their support. Unless there's a deliberate intent to deceive, then one can't really assume.
If someone sees it and asks if he served, he can just say, "No, but I support those who defend our country."
If his wife goes around saying she's an "Army wife," then she would be the one lying, not the guy with the tattoo.
Just in case anyone gets confused upon seeing my tattoo, my name isn't Renée.Conceivably, one could have such a tattoo in honor of a friend or family member who served. Or they could just be a militarist who likes the military and wants to show their support. Unless there's a deliberate intent to deceive, then one can't really assume.
Maybe, but as a civilian I'd never have such a tattoo, it would feel wrong and disrespectful and I'd worry about people taking it the wrong way and thinking I had bad motives
Having a patriotic nonspecific one would however be entirely different
I mean he could have had an Eagle tattoo or something?
What do people think of this?
I think if he goes anywhere near any real soldiers he'll most likely get beaten up!
His wife is clearly delusional too
And surely this counts as "stolen valour"?
What a moron
View attachment 88457