Robert William
Member
Another one that can't give verifiable evidence for evolution, just show us just one change of kind!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Demanding scientific evidence for the existence of God is ridiculous
- Thread starter Gambit
- Start date
Another one that can't give verifiable evidence for evolution, just show us just one change of kind!
Robert William
Member
Yet another one that can't give us verifiable evidence for evolution or change of kind.
I'm beginning to wonder who is the one that has blind faith???? It requires great faith to believe something came from nothing. LOL
dust1n
Zindīq
There's no such thing as a kind, and there is no scientific evidence to support to existence of a kind, so it would be impossible to show you a transition form one kind to another, because there is no such thing as a kind in the first place.
Skwim
Veteran Member
What's a "kind," is it a species or something else? If something else, what "else" is it?
dust1n
Zindīq
It's the imaginary line where genetics stop working suddenly to protect the emotions of the pious.
Skwim
Veteran Member
Please, no help from the knowledgeable.It's the imaginary line where genetics stop working suddenly to protect the emotions of the pious.
dust1n
Zindīq
I anticipate the answer.
Awkward Fingers
Omphaloskeptic
I haven't said I could, or would.. yet. All I've done is asked you 2 simple questions, back to back. That is the extent of what has occurred between us.Yet another one that can't give us verifiable evidence for evolution or change of kind.
I'm beginning to wonder who is the one that has blind faith???? It requires great faith to believe something came from nothing. LOL
The fact that you have to avoid the question AND makeup lies to follow it show exactly how much your comments are worth.
Isn't "kinds" where seagulls get lumped with bats because they both fly, but not ostriches because they don't?
Tom
outhouse
Atheistically
Im sorry Robert but Evolution has been fact for quite some time, its not up for debate.
Factually only fanaticism and fundamentalism reject the credible facts taught of evolution in EVER MAJOR UNIVERSITY around the world as higher learning.
While creation is outlawed from school children so we don't poison their minds in science class.
Why do you hate education?????????????????????
Acintya_Ash
Bhakta
Yes, its utterly ridiculous and any sane person who's read the definition of God won't ask for empirical evidence.
Its like saying show me proof for Infinity or i won't do mathematics.
Last edited:
ratikala
Istha gosthi
namaskaram prabhi jis
jai jai , ...whole heartedly agree , .....
Yes, its utterly ridiculous andwho's read the definition of God won't ask for empirical evidence.
Its like saying show me proof for Infinity or i won't do mathematics.
jai jai , ...whole heartedly agree , .....
ratikala
Istha gosthi
namaskaram luis ji
to egnore is a sad loss , ...how can something so vast and all encompasing even be reduced to an ''it'' , ....or even a partical to be searched for , ...?
even the deifinitions we may give are only as good as the extent to which the recipiant of said definition is prepaired to extend him self , ....
even by the use of ''He'' there is some acknoledgement of His existance , this is proof enough that some where deep within the human psyche there is knowledge of God , ...what need then is there for proof just personal introspection ....
not one Scientist or atheist is alike each seeks to answer his own questions so there should not be a solid ''we'' who are demanding , ...but there are some that do seek such eveidence , but even amnngst those that do seek evedence each will do so for different reasons
to egnore is a sad loss , ...how can something so vast and all encompasing even be reduced to an ''it'' , ....or even a partical to be searched for , ...?
even the deifinitions we may give are only as good as the extent to which the recipiant of said definition is prepaired to extend him self , ....
even by the use of ''He'' there is some acknoledgement of His existance , this is proof enough that some where deep within the human psyche there is knowledge of God , ...what need then is there for proof just personal introspection ....
not one Scientist or atheist is alike each seeks to answer his own questions so there should not be a solid ''we'' who are demanding , ...but there are some that do seek such eveidence , but even amnngst those that do seek evedence each will do so for different reasons
Since you are asking me directly, Ratikala: it usually begins by making the concept the sustaining piece of a doctrine.
It is just not at all suited for such an important role.
I believe you are hoping for a very different answer, but that is mine.
I don't know what you mean by "entension" here, but if it involves blind belief it is just not something I am interested on.
even by the use of ''He'' there is some acknoledgement of His existance , this is proof enough that some where deep within the human psyche there is knowledge of God , ...what need then is there for proof just personal introspection ....
Oh, Ratikala. Do you truly have no idea of how wrong you are in saying such a thing?
Being aware of the existence of the concept is a concession to theists. I wish you had more respect for that concession.
Such arrogance, Ratikala.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
That wasn't nice.....
I suppose it is not nice to refuse to be manipulated.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
So, if I describe Harry Potter or The Cat in the Hat or Gandalf as "He", that must mean there is knowledge of these characters, and therefore they must exist?even by the use of ''He'' there is some acknoledgement of His existance , this is proof enough that some where deep within the human psyche there is knowledge of God , ...what need then is there for proof just personal introspection ....
Thief
Rogue Theologian
as long as the stick swings both ways.....
I think nonbelief is shallow.
All this life we have on this planet with so much detail....
All this humanity looking up....
Thief
Rogue Theologian
How shall I describe thee?....let me count the ways.....
oh....just a collection of writings.....
Robert William
Member
Humans reproduce after their kind, Dogs reproduce after their kind. I am still waiting for verifiable evidence for evolution.