Interesting
My initial thought was RoboCop lol
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Democrat controlled San Francisco Police wants to kill people with this...
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
My initial thought was RoboCop lol
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I was thinking modified tazer myself. Short out the bugger somehow.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I'm gonna watch it again. Then I'll know what to do.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Just like the Democrats.
Of course there's still time to terminate the proposal with a Dalek.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Maybe in Israel?
Unaware of similar proposals in Red States like Texas. Just the blue state of California as it stands.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I mentioned in an earlier post it will likely and eventually lead to autonomous platforms down the road if this gets approved.
Democrat controlled San Francisco Police wants to kill people with this...
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Considering we already use UAVs in the military and they take out plenty of innocent civilians as well as military targets, I would consider this a real problem. I just see it as likely being bipartisan.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It is bipartisan.
Texas (Dallas) already employed and used robotics to kill a sniper in the past. A black man out to kill whites.
Of course, the officers who used it were not charged.
No charges for Dallas officers who killed sniper with robot bomb
Now Democrats apparently want to use it.
We will see what they decide.
wellwisher
Well-Known Member
In the summer of 2020, the mostly peaceful protests against the police; de-fund the police, most of the rioting was done in cities controlled by the Democrats. Common sense tells me Democrat run cities was where the problem was the worse; cause and affect. If ti had been worse in Republican cities that pot would have boiled over first and strongest.
The rank and file police, in all cities, are under a police chief who is under the mayor. Politics controls the police, and the backlash by the civilians was worse where Democrat politics controlled the cities and the police.
The Democrats took a U-turn after this cause and affect became obvious and hard to spin away; they were the source of the problem. Their coverup solution was to reduce the number of police and not prosecute real crimes, thereby lowering their bad crime statistics numbers on paper, but not in hard reality.
The victims of crime have increased but on paper there are less criminals. One more example of trying to game the system instead of solving the problems. Robots is more about spending money and raising taxes to deal with the crime wave, they recently created, while blaming everyone but themselves. The Civilians need protest the Mayor and City Councils since the bulk stops there and not at the police. That was a misdirect to escape what was due to them. They keep getting elected based on misdirection.
Last edited:
'“Robots will only be used as a deadly force option when risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers are imminent and outweigh any other force option available to SFPD,” part of the policy states'
Source: the first link in the OP.
So we are talking about a tool remotely controlled by officers to take down hostiles were there are no other suitable options.
So what other tools of lethal force are you suggesting we deprive the police of?
Are you also opposed to police carrying guns?
If you are why should civilians be allowed to carry tools of lethal force and not police officers.
If not what is the critical difference between a remote option and say a sniper rifle?
In my opinion.
Killer robots have great potential to reduce
problems with cops....
1) Information:
- Ensue recordings can be accessed by all appropriate parties,
not just cops.
- Ensure recording process is always on when appropriate,
& cannot be stopped or muted.
2) Safety:
- Letting robots handle dangerous situations could mitigate
the cop culture of killing civilians out of unreasonable fear.
- Providing robots with multiple less-than-lethal tools.
- Keeping cops out of harms way.
- Robots needn't kill in self defense.
- More potential for civilian oversight.
- Robot could be programmed to manipulate emotions,
eg, de-escalate.
problems with cops....
1) Information:
- Ensue recordings can be accessed by all appropriate parties,
not just cops.
- Ensure recording process is always on when appropriate,
& cannot be stopped or muted.
2) Safety:
- Letting robots handle dangerous situations could mitigate
the cop culture of killing civilians out of unreasonable fear.
- Providing robots with multiple less-than-lethal tools.
- Keeping cops out of harms way.
- Robots needn't kill in self defense.
- More potential for civilian oversight.
- Robot could be programmed to manipulate emotions,
eg, de-escalate.
Guitar's Cry
Disciple of Pan
Killer robots have great potential to reduce
problems with cops....
1) Information:
- Ensue recordings can be accessed by all appropriate parties,
not just cops.
- Ensure recording process is always on when appropriate,
& cannot be stopped or muted.
2) Safety:
- Letting robots handle dangerous situations could mitigate
the cop culture of killing civilians out of unreasonable fear.
- Providing robots with multiple less-than-lethal tools.
- Keeping cops out of harms way.
- Robots needn't kill in self defense.
- More potential for civilian oversight.
- Robot could be programmed to manipulate emotions,
eg, de-escalate.
Good insights!
Killer robots have great potential to reduce
problems with cops....
1) Information:
- Ensue recordings can be accessed by all appropriate parties,
not just cops.
- Ensure recording process is always on when appropriate,
& cannot be stopped or muted.
2) Safety:
- Letting robots handle dangerous situations could mitigate
the cop culture of killing civilians out of unreasonable fear.
- Providing robots with multiple less-than-lethal tools.
- Keeping cops out of harms way.
- Robots needn't kill in self defense.
- More potential for civilian oversight.
- Robot could be programmed to manipulate emotions,
eg, de-escalate.
I guess it would depend on who's programming them. It could also turn out like this:
Or...I guess it would depend on who's programming them. It could also turn out like this:
Or...
That ED-209 is just a souped-up, armed version of Uniblab.
Although at least Uniblab could play cards and make coffee, which makes him more useful than ED-209.
That's just a more futuristic versionThat ED-209 is just a souped-up, armed version of Uniblab.
Although at least Uniblab could play cards and make coffee, which makes him more useful than ED-209.
of The Master Cylinder.
Sedim Haba
Outa here... bye-bye!
Last edited:
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
A psychopath with a badge and joystick is going to have a lot of fun.Killer robots have great potential to reduce
problems with cops....
1) Information:
- Ensue recordings can be accessed by all appropriate parties,
not just cops.
- Ensure recording process is always on when appropriate,
& cannot be stopped or muted.
2) Safety:
- Letting robots handle dangerous situations could mitigate
the cop culture of killing civilians out of unreasonable fear.
- Providing robots with multiple less-than-lethal tools.
- Keeping cops out of harms way.
- Robots needn't kill in self defense.
- More potential for civilian oversight.
- Robot could be programmed to manipulate emotions,
eg, de-escalate.
"Stop resisting my robot! I told you to stop resisting my robot!!!
Bang!
Well maybe the police who pilot said robots should first be required to undergo extensive mental health evaluation, constantly
That said, perhaps not any would pass lol
