Democrat Tyranny

[Nicholas]

Is this a joke?

Surely nobody with any brains takes Breitbart seriously, do they? Read a proper news source, for God's sake.

High IQ + propriety = Democrat keynote

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

clickbait

 

[Shadow Wolf]

High IQ + propriety = Democrat keynote

No, it's that Brietbart has no credibility. They themselves shot that full of holes amd threw the carcass out the window. It's up their with the nonsense the seeps from the mouth of Alex Jones.

 

[Nicholas]

No, it's that Brietbart has no credibility. They themselves shot that full of holes amd threw the carcass out the window. It's up there with the nonsense that seeps from the mouth of Alex Jones.

A very proper & predictable response. Hope you do not mind my proofreading your post in bold & underlining.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

A very proper & predictable response. Hope you do not mind my proofreading your post in bold & underlining.

Yes, actually I do mind and I do minf very much when I'm grammatically correct and have no spelling errors. I argued that with a college professor whi tried to mark me wrong.
So do go bugger off with your flawed "proofreading." (I'm an English writing minor with grad school writing abikity so don't test me. You'll lose.).

 

[anna.]

#1 was Hillary, #2 was Obama.

I‘m shocked, I tell ya! Shocked!

 

[VoidCat]

A very proper & predictable response. Hope you do not mind my proofreading your post in bold & underlining.

I saw a few grammar mistakes like writing their instead of there. But that has nothing to do with if a point is good or not. Some folk are dyslexic, some english aint their first langauge, and everyone makes spelling and grammar mistakes from time to time even english professors. Doesnt mean the person is uneducated or that their point is wrong. Instead if you understand the point and disagree with it...how bout you break down why the point is wrong instead of correcting the grammar and spelling?

 

[Nicholas]

Wolf's assertion was Breitbart was not a credible source. He gives only his asserted belief. My belief is opposite. People generally, in my experience like or dislike a news source mainly based on just that -- like or dislike. So no point in arguing preferences.

 

[Secret Chief]

Wolf's assertion was Breitbart was not a credible source. He gives only his asserted belief. My belief is opposite. People generally, in my experience like or dislike a news source mainly based on just that -- like or dislike. So no point in arguing preferences.

And you concur with opinions in this:

"Breitbart News ... is an American far-right syndicated news, opinion, and commentary website founded in mid-2007 by American conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart. Its content has been described as misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by academics and journalists. The site has published a number of conspiracy theories and intentionally misleading stories."

Breitbart News - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

"Overall, we rate Breitbart Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, the publication of conspiracy theories and propaganda, as well as numerous false claims."
Breitbart - Bias and Credibility

 

[PoetPhilosopher]

Wolf's assertion was Breitbart was not a credible source. He gives only his asserted belief. My belief is opposite. People generally, in my experience like or dislike a news source mainly based on just that -- like or dislike. So no point in arguing preferences.

When it comes to news sources, there are two things I consider - political lean, and what "accuracy rating" the experts give it.

There's actually a third thing, too.... I may not have the qualifications or know-how to debunk every news piece, but if a news source is publishing a bunch of other articles I know can't be true, I might factor that in in some way when considering the news source, too.

 

[Nicholas]

My personal preference in most matters of import is traditional & conservative. Yet following experts is a popular attitude, so here is one site for those who like rankings:

70 Best Conservative News Websites in 2023

 

[Unfettered]

I'm honestly surprised that a blatantly white supremacist outlet like Breitbart would call the BLM protesters' grievances "legitimate".

When I read it, I see that it was the protests that were understood to be legitimate, with no mention at all of grievances:

"Democrats governors and mayors do nothing to stop rioters who exploit legitimate … protests to burn and loot in major cities, prompting the country to board up storefronts from coast to coast."

IE, persons protesting illegitimate grievances still have the right to peaceably assemble.

 

[Subduction Zone]

My personal preference in most matters of import is traditional & conservative. Yet following experts is a popular attitude, so here is one site for those who like rankings:

70 Best Conservative News Websites in 2023

So it is fourth best of the worst. And we are supposed to be impressed by that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Try as I will, I can't stop reading "Democrat Tranny".

Dammit Spock!!

https://imgur.com/a/JYtqsDj

Now that is all that I see too.