We Never Know
No Slack
$7 trillion is 70% of $23 trillion?and 70% of that increase happened under Trump
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
$7 trillion is 70% of $23 trillion?and 70% of that increase happened under Trump
One massively mismanaged pandemic during that 4 years of Trump. And before that a hugely mismanaged set of wars and the housing market that Obama inherited. So yeah. Try selling this to some other rube.In 2008 the debt was $12 trillion.
Now its $35 trillion. Almost tripled.
Up $23 trillion in 16 years.
12 years democrat presidents
4 years republican president.
It was and is the Tax Cuts from Reagan and Bush and Trump that have driven the deficit, They always claim it will improve the economy but all it does is increase the deficit which the Democrats then have to lower.$7 trillion is 70% of $23 trillion?
And many, many Caucasians whose bloodlines run steadily in the slave states, even as far back as 300 years, have African DNA markers in their 5th, 6th, and 7th generations. The TV show "Finding Your Roots" showed the links for Country Music Entertainer, Clint Black, and both parents of Roseanne Cash. My family tree also has African markers from ~1800.Yes, the "One drop" rule comes from America's extremely racist past. Most African Americans are part white. Quite a few plantation owners exercised their "rights of ownership" over young female slaves. In fact the average African American is roughly 25% European by genetics:
The Genetic Ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States - PMC
Over the past 500 years, North America has been the site of ongoing mixing of Native Americans, European settlers, and Africans (brought largely by the trans-Atlantic slave trade), shaping the early history of what became the United States. We ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And if you are willing to dig deeply enough into the definition of "African American" you will find that Obama was not the first "African American" when he was elected. At that time the definition was that one had to be the descendant of African slaves to be an African American. His father was from Kenya so he did not have any slave heritage in him. Though of course that does not change the fact that there will be prejudice against those people because they are "black". The definition changed when people realized that the slave requirement was counterproductive. You can confirm this by going to such sites as Wikipedia where they keep all of their old articles. You would need to check their archive about 20 years ago in the article on African Americans.
I am willing to give Trump a partial excuse due to the Covid pandemic. Even if he ran the country perfectly there still would have been massive debt as a result of that. But he is without excuse for his reversal of the decrease of the deficit. Early on in Obama's term he had a recession to fight. Targeted heavy spending helped us get out of it and that did boost the deficit. But as we recovered Obama's economy saw the deficit continually decrease. That is until Trump took over and started his new tax cut where the vast majority of the money went to the rich. The deficit rose under Trump to make it look as if we had a stronger economy than we did. He was driving us to another recession before Covid struck. Covid brought on that recession early. And even more massive spending was needed under both Trump and Biden. Biden engineered a soft landing after we were struck by the global inflation caused by the spending on Covid and the war in Ukraine.It was and is the Tax Cuts from Reagan and Bush and Trump that have driven the deficit, They always claim it will improve the economy but all it does is increase the deficit which the Democrats then have to lower.
Exactly. The deficit has to come down but to do that both spending AND taxation need to be part of the solution. Even some of the mega-rich recognize this and have put forth ideas which sound reasonable to me. The CBO created a list of options to reduce the deficit Options for Reducing the Deficit - I'm not a fan of some of them but they to me are a starting point for serious discussions.It was and is the Tax Cuts from Reagan and Bush and Trump that have driven the deficit, They always claim it will improve the economy but all it does is increase the deficit which the Democrats then have to lower.
This proposal isn't mixed. It is government and bureaucrat control.Charities have never been enough if one knows anything about the Great Depression and even modern economics.
The reality of economics is that helping the poor lifts the entire economy since they are more apt to spend most of their money locally. If the breaks go to the wealthy, they're more apt to seek tax shelters lie the Grand Caymans than the poor.
NO COUNTRY has been able to keep a laissez faire approach to economics, which is why every country in the world nowadays has a mixed-economy of one type or another.
Then you would love the system in Venezuela.I call that a Miltonian Pipedream. It doesn't happen that way and we have lots of history to know it will never turn out that way. Withoutl regulation a free market means free to trade alcohol and firearms for human beings who get reduced to property.
It works in the UK. I'm a pensioner, all prescriptions are free. Even those who pay, pay a minimal amount, I think it is currently £9.90.
Really? This worn-out false dichotomy?Then you would love the system in Venezuela.
Then how odd is it that rest of the developed world doesn't seem to want a privatized, for-profit system like ours? Weird, because who wouldn't want to be gouged into debt by a predatory racket?The UK system isn't better. It sucks.
Absolute rubbish, yes, we pay taxes, taxes are good.
It isn't "free". It is paid for out of taxes and indirect subsidies of the U.S. paying the cost to develop the drugs. The NHS spent £10.4 billion subsidizing drugs in 2023. You also have restrictions on getting drugs unlike in the U.S. The rising costs of drugs for the NHS threatens to bankrupt it and it actively restricts the introduction of new medicines.
Costs of expensive new drugs threaten financial sustainability of NHS
The UK system isn't better. It sucks.
Probably has something to do with my husband passing away in 2020. Call me crazy.
This proposal isn't mixed. It is government and bureaucrat control.
The UK system isn't better. It sucks.
Personally I like the Swiss system a bit better because there's choice involved even if it is more expensive.Absolute rubbish, yes, we pay taxes, taxes are good.
The NHS is only going bankrupt because of 14-years of bad management; it will be put right by the current government.
We do not have people going bankrupt because of illness or scared to call an ambulance.
Our country is civilised, you should try it.
So only 10 million people, obviously nothing to care about.I think about 3 percent of the population of the US files for medical bankruptcy. Meaning that 97 percent do not.
I think about 3 percent of the population of the US files for medical bankruptcy. Meaning that 97 percent do not.