-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Democrats packing swing states with illegals and Elon Musk warns if they win , this could be our last election.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
Yerda
Veteran Member
I see you didn't look at the numbers.
Number of Unauthorized (Illegal) Immigrants By US State - Brilliant Maps
Map by Visual Capitalist based on 2021 data from Pew ResearchThe map shows the estimated population of unauthorized immigrants in each state of the Unitedbrilliantmaps.com
- These figures are from 2021.
- Almost a fifth of the estimated number of undocumented immigrants are in California which doesn't do the Democratic party a great deal of good.
- On first look the numbers appear to vary with state population and proximity to the border rather than swing state status.
From wiki page, List of U.S. states and territories by population:
I would advise never listening to Elon Musk. Or Trump. They are both malicious actors who lie continually.
All the best.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Actually Musk is said to have had more recent data than I could find to support his view. I think Google is incredibly biased and since it's a story, it's now almost impossible to get that specific source.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I find his prediction interesting.
I find it unfounded & dishonest.
Musk can't be that stupid.
So it's political fear mongering on behalf of Trump.
BTW, Trump is the one who told Christians that if
they elect him, it's the last time they'll have to vote.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I'm starting to think it's a very real possibility.
Its why Democrats don't want to shut down the border. They want countless illegals to be declared citizens in a mass amnesty and dependent on the Democrat party so they can rig the odds in their favor to the point they will always be elected to office with no chance any Republican will ever win again.
That's how they will steal the election and take over the country as a one party state.
That's basically the gist of it and I find it incredibly interesting. It's pretty much what happened here in the People's Republic of New York where it pretty much negates any Republican efforts to turn the state even purple.
Trump had poor border security when in office.
Then after that, he opposed increasing border security.
Yet you want him as President?
Yet the 2020 election's only election fraud that
has been evidenced was committed by Trump
& his minions....
- Ordered Pence to over-turn it.
- Insurrection
- Fake electors in 7 states.
- Threating election officials with prosecution
if they don't "find" his needed votes.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Screwed two ways to Sunday eh?
Sometimes, I forget that roughly a half of this country literally lives an alternative reality that is thoroughly detached from actual reality...
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No better or worse with the dictator on day one crowd.
Alien826
No religious beliefs
I'm wondering how these "illegals" would become citizens.
First, they need to attain Permanent Resident ("green card") status. That would be denied based on being in the country illegally. Then they have to have that status for three years if married to a citizen or five or more years if not (that's me, btw, I'm currently applying for citizenship). Part of that is an FBI background check which would reveal their illegal entry to the country.
Reagan granted legal status to millions of illegals, but that didn't give them citizenship They just became permanent residents. It also required an Act of Congress, which would be highly unlikely today. The Dems are struggling to hold on to the Senate and gain the House as I understand it.
Then we have the current SCOTUS which would block any such attempt.
Note that I'm accepting for the sake of discussion that the Dems actually are planning all this, which is highly dubious imo. I think we would be better served by worrying about Marjorie Taylor Greene's Jewish space lasers, or the NOAA's weaponized weather control than this.
First, they need to attain Permanent Resident ("green card") status. That would be denied based on being in the country illegally. Then they have to have that status for three years if married to a citizen or five or more years if not (that's me, btw, I'm currently applying for citizenship). Part of that is an FBI background check which would reveal their illegal entry to the country.
Reagan granted legal status to millions of illegals, but that didn't give them citizenship They just became permanent residents. It also required an Act of Congress, which would be highly unlikely today. The Dems are struggling to hold on to the Senate and gain the House as I understand it.
Then we have the current SCOTUS which would block any such attempt.
Note that I'm accepting for the sake of discussion that the Dems actually are planning all this, which is highly dubious imo. I think we would be better served by worrying about Marjorie Taylor Greene's Jewish space lasers, or the NOAA's weaponized weather control than this.
RestlessSoul
Well-Known Member
Colt
Well-Known Member
Yes, because like legal citizens they wouldn't be voting for a saint or his character, they are voting for the agenda of the (R) party.So they would vote for a convicted criminal who cheats on his wife with pornstars, pays them in illegal ways to shut up about it, is a pathological liar, looks up to authoritarian dictators and says things about women like "you just have to grab them by the *kitten*"? Yeah, makes perfect sense.
Colt
Well-Known Member
Yes, because like legal citizens they wouldn't be voting for a saint or his character, they are voting for the agenda of the (R) party.
(D)'s have shown that poor character is acceptable if the agenda is important to them. Same with (R)'s.
Oh my!
Billionaire Entrepreneur Elon Musk Drops Bone-Chilling Warning Ahead Of November Election - Musk Warns Trump Loss Could Mean 'Last Election' For U.S.
Everyone should see this.conservativebrief.com
All one has to do is look at the states where the most migrants are being shipped and it is uncanny his prediction that if the Democrats win , they will use their term to grant mass citizenship to these illegals and there will be so many new citizens that people will never be able to vote in a Republican again.
This is how Democrats will steal an election and why the borders are kept wide open with the Democrats refusing to close the border for the past 3 and 1/2 years.
It might sound crazy to some , and that is your right to think so , but keep in mind Elon Musk'a IQ and that this man is one of the smartest people in the world.
Democrats are dangerous now and we will find out if they win and how accurate Elon Musk will be on this.
Food for thought as I see it.
.
Those people could not possibly be misinforming or even (choke) lying their own entrails out of their mouths, now could they?
Nah. Of of course they are.
Next.
HonestJoe
Well-Known Member
Even if that scenario actually happened, why would it automatically mean a Republican President could never be elected? Even if there was a level of loyalty to the people who grants immigrants citizenship, that would still need to be maintained, and there would be nothing stopping Republican candidates appealing to a majority of the population, new citizens included. After all, a lot of the immigrants from central and south American are likely to have social and cultural backgrounds that would favour a traditional Republican lean.
Intelligent doesn't automatically mean honest. Smart people can also be good at lying to you for their own benefit.
McBell
Unbound
Seeing as Republicans do not know the difference between legals and illegals, which is thoroughly evidenced by the Springfield, Ohio debacle, this OP is a big fat nothing burgerBillionaire Entrepreneur Elon Musk Drops Bone-Chilling Warning Ahead Of November Election - Musk Warns Trump Loss Could Mean 'Last Election' For U.S.
Everyone should see this.
All one has to do is look at the states where the most migrants are being shipped and it is uncanny his prediction that if the Democrats win , they will use their term to grant mass citizenship to these illegals and there will be so many new citizens that people will never be able to vote in a Republican again.
This is how Democrats will steal an election and why the borders are kept wide open with the Democrats refusing to close the border for the past 3 and 1/2 years.
It might sound crazy to some , and that is your right to think so , but keep in mind Elon Musk'a IQ and that this man is one of the smartest people in the world.
Democrats are dangerous now and we will find out if they win and how accurate Elon Musk will be on this.
Food for thought as I see it.
.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Oh without question Republicans know exactly the difference between illegal and legal migrants. What's most important is the community itself and the people who live there.
Rather than their pandering government who thinks they know better than the residents who are there, if the citizens want them, then I'd say they would have their blessing which would be a win-win, but if not , you know where they can be shipped to.
McBell
Unbound
So then you are saying that Republicans are just simply attacking foreigners for being foreigners?
legal or illegal be damned! gotta get rid of all them foreigners!
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
No oh I'm saying is you put them where the citizenry wants them. Why the hell would you put them there where the citizens don't want non-citizens being placed in mass quantities in their neighborhoods by the literal thousands all at one time in a single spot?
That's a recurring habit that the government likes to do and it disrupts everything in that environment were it erupts in complete chaos.
Maybe a hundred or so over the course of several years might not be as bad as putting thousands and thousands in the single spot in weeks.
Do you get the picture now?