Democrats say the damnedest things.....

[Revoltingest]

I understand completely what she said. Not my problem you don't. You most likely hold a minority view in America of the statement.

If you understand, then perhaps you could enlighten us about what she meant when she said it's legal to hunt humans.

 

[Revoltingest]

Still does not change the fact that her statement was illogical and load of emotional BS.

A fervent Democrat would never admit that about one of their own.
Loyalty is more important than truth.

 

[Father Heathen]

A fervent Democrat would never admit that about one of their own.
Loyalty is more important than truth.

And republicans never place partisanship before principals.

 

[Revoltingest]

And republicans never place partisanship before principals.

There's no need to school me with a sarcastic jab at the Pubs.
I've long claimed they're just as full of delusional partisanship as the Dems.
But this is, after all, a thread about damnable things said by Dems.


Is this the point where some Dem apologist will jump & scream "False equivalency!"?

 

[tytlyf]

If you understand, then perhaps you could enlighten us about what she meant when she said it's legal to hunt humans.

I've already explained it.

 

[Reverend Rick]

Liberals make it a high art to deflect, "Look over here and ignore our hypocrisy".

 

[YmirGF]

I've already explained it.

Even if true, your explanation remains inane and does nothing to mitigate the abject stupidity of the statement made by Senator Feinstein.

 

[tytlyf]

Even if true, your explanation remains inane and does nothing to mitigate the abject stupidity of the statement made by Senator Feinstein.

I understood exactly what she was referring to the first time I listened to the entire speech. We'll just have to disagree.

 

[YmirGF]

I understood exactly what she was referring to the first time I listened to the entire speech. We'll just have to disagree.

So you are good with the equating hunters with murderers?

 

[Revoltingest]

I'll break it down for you in the context of the sentence. 2 parts.
"Legal to hunt humans"
"Legal"
-referring to the magazine capacities that are legal
"Hunt humans"
-referring to the shooters of the mass-murder tragedies of late (colombine, aurora, newtown)
Why does everything have to be spun?

If she says it's "legal to hunt humans", & she wants to reduce the magazine capacity of weapons used to hunt humans,
they yes....we agree on what she said. This appears to be a meaning without spin. But I get a strong impression that
Dem apologists are spinning it such that she meant somethings else. What on Earth would it be?

 

[Reverend Rick]

Dem apologists are spinning it such that she meant somethings else. What on Earth would it be?

That she broke her oath to defend the constitution?

 

[tytlyf]

So you are good with the equating hunters with murderers?

She's not referring to casual game hunters, etc. She's referring to these sick individuals who's plan is to hunt humans and kill as many as possible. She's just mentioning that the legal part of that statement is the magazine sizes which are legal to own.

Here's the transcript.

“The time has come, America, to step up and ban these weapons,” Feinstein said. “The other very important part of this bill is to ban large capacity ammunition feeding devices — those that hold more than 10 rounds. We have federal regulations and state laws that prohibit hunting ducks with more than three rounds. And yet it’s legal to hunt humans with 15-round, 30-round, even 150-round magazines. Limiting magazine capacity is critical, because it is when a criminal, a drug dealer, a deranged individual has to pause to change magazines and reload that, the police or brave bystanders have the opportunity to take that individual down.”

Read more: Dianne Feinstein: 'It's legal to hunt humans' with high-capacity magazines [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller​

 

[Reverend Rick]

It must be legal, you hear of manhunts on TV all the time.

 

[Alceste]

I think we'd have a lot more topics and updates of conversation if I just start a "Republicans say the damnedest things" thread.

Here

http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/north-american-politics/139854-stuff-republicans-say.html

One interesting difference is that you don't need to pluck sentence fragments out of context to make this stuff sound ridiculous.

I might do an update myself. Bachmann has been flapping her jaw most amusingly.

 

[Father Heathen]

While what what she said wasn't meant to be taken literally, the logic is still nonsensical. It's like claiming a car with more horse power equates to legalized vehicular manslaughter.

 

[Father Heathen]

That she broke her oath to defend the constitution?

To be fair, reducing magazine capacity isn't the same as completely removing the ability to be armed.

 

[YmirGF]

To be fair, reducing magazine capacity isn't the same as completely removing the ability to be armed.

And at least she didn't tell folks to buy a shotgun and fire it through a door, or fire both barrels into the air.

 

[Revoltingest]

And at least she didn't tell folks to buy a shotgun and fire it through a door, or fire both barrels into the air.

Biden Advises Shooting Shotgun Through Door - US News and World Report

Vice President Joe Biden told Field & Stream magazine in an interview published Monday, "[if] you want to keep
someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door." Coincidentally, a 22-year-old man in
Virginia Beach, Va., was charged Monday with reckless handling of a firearm after doing just that a couple days earlier.

This man is Obama's best guardian.
Even I would take a bullet to save Obama, lest we see Biden's finger on the nuclear button.

 

[4consideration]

By her logic, I wonder if she also thinks that axe murdering is legal, since large axes are easily available to the public. If big, dangerous things being available for purchase makes anything you do with that thing somehow suddenly legal, one might think so -- but only if you use a large one -- small ones still make the act illegal, I suppose.

 

[YmirGF]

My personal favorite daft Democrat quote is this:

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

It is a very uncomfortable choice of words in the first sentence. "The future MUST NOT belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Chilling stuff, to be sure. What is laughable is the thought of those rampaging mobs throwing a hissy fit over the last part of this short paragraph. Um, not gonna happen, Barry.