How does this even make sense?
Is it just some sick way to get back at John McCain?
If a soldier is not a citizen and fathers a child with a foreigner outside of the US, that soldier has no US citizenship to confer upon the child. And if the US employs locals (non-US citizens) to work desk jobs or custodial jobs or something of that nature at a given embassy or office, I don't see how their children could be considered US citizens either. Where this policy
does confuse me, however, is whether US military bases are still considered US soil for the purposes of citizenship. Now, a child of a US citizen with established residence in the US is still unaffected by this policy; the parent is a US citizen, and so automatically confers US citizenship on their child as well. The policy states that somebody who is sent abroad by the US government in an official employment capacity is not considered to have ceased residing in the US.
Case in point, permanent residents of the US who must have 5 years of continuous residence in the US are not considered to have interrupted their residence if they are sent by the US government to work in a government office or on a military base. My understanding after reading the policy in full is that their official residency is considered to be put on pause.