• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Did Hillary's 'brain have a short circuit' as she claimed or did she lie?

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Seems a rather lame excuse to me when faced with the FBI saying she lied to the American people and then she lied about lying... and now she claims she didn't lie.... her brain just had a short circuit

Hillary Clinton: "I May Have Short-Circuited The Truth" About The Email Scandal
 

Sees

Dragonslayer
Look at her recent "press conference"...that so much isn't right with her and her campaign is just too obvious.
 

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
Bold faced lying.
Flat out lying.
Look you in the eyes and lying.
Pathological lying.
Political lying. (what's the difference between ^^ and this!?"
Just plain lying.
Lying when truth would serve better.
Compulsive lying.
And in Killary's case "official" lying to mislead, deliberately conveying a false impression.
There!
I said it.
She is a liar to the public to mislead and deliberately convey a false impression.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
Funny that all you guys seem to be supporters of "Honest Injun" Donald Trump.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Funny that all you guys seem to be supporters of "Honest Injun" Donald Trump.
I don't ever support candidates because of honesty.
While that's an admirable trait personally, what matters is what they'll do in office.
Sample issue....
I know Hilda will raise my taxes.
It doesn't matter if she admits this or lies to me about it.
I just don't want her to do this.

But sometimes candidates do things which warrant discussion.
People must learn to discern between what matters for voting, & what matters for carping.
 

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
I don't ever support candidates because of honesty.
While that's an admirable trait personally, what matters is what they'll do in office.
Sample issue....
I know Hilda will raise my taxes.
It doesn't matter if she admits this or lies to me about it.
I just don't want her to do this.

But sometimes candidates do things which warrant discussion.
People must learn to discern between what matters for voting, & what matters for carping.

I totally agree.
Sadly way too many people who vote follow party lines only.
I've noticed that people who make a lifestyle of living off taxpayers dollars
vote for the " We will give you everything." party.
I call these career money suckers "gimme" people.
"Gimme mo', I wants mo', I needs mo', gimme mo' " ,thus IF they vote
they WILL vote for the candidate that give them mo'.
And "gimme" people vote liberal.

I'm now 100% disabled and take ZERO tax dollars.
My income is a result of my private pension and my meager investments.
My health benefits are paid for by ...............................ME!
I haven't a clue why anyone would vote for Hildabeast.
That other guy will get anti Hildabeast votes.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I totally agree.
Sadly way too many people who vote follow party lines only.
I've noticed that people who make a lifestyle of living off taxpayers dollars
vote for the " We will give you everything." party.
I call these career money suckers "gimme" people.
"Gimme mo', I wants mo', I needs mo', gimme mo' " ,thus IF they vote
they WILL vote for the candidate that give them mo'.
And "gimme" people vote liberal.

I'm now 100% disabled and take ZERO tax dollars.
My income is a result of my private pension and my meager investments.
My health benefits are paid for by ...............................ME!
I haven't a clue why anyone would vote for Hildabeast.
That other guy will get anti Hildabeast votes.
Many people supporting HIlda have clear & valid reasons for doing so.
Wanting to live off government largesse is one of them.
Favoring a bigger & more powerful federal gov is another.
I won't dissuade them from planning to vote for her.
I only urge clarity in weighing one's options....wherever this leads.

Btw, I'm a professional Social Security recipient.
But I oppose a pay increase for my ilk.
 

Knight of Albion

Well-Known Member
'Short-circuited' the truth only a politician could come up with that one!

As a Brit, and I think most Brits would think the same on this, 320 million citizens to choose from and you end up with Hilary Clinton and Donald J. Trump ... How come????
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
'Short-circuited' the truth only a politician could come up with that one!
As a Brit, and I think most Brits would think the same on this, 320 million citizens to choose from and you end up with Hilary Clinton and Donald J. Trump ... How come????
In a nutshell......
- The DNC picked Hillary to crate the Clinton presidential dynasty.
- They arranged voting for her to win.
- The RNC failed to exercise such control.
- In a weak field, the candidate willing to openly & proudly insult Rosie O'donnell won.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
Meta-lying?
Well, since she presents ideals closest to my heart, we call it "changing her mind". If Trump does it, however, he is a gummy bear chewin, rotten nosed, phone answerin', coffee wastin', cheatin', liar butt head! I think this is accurate and non-hypocritical... stop laughing! :p
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Well, since she presents ideals closest to my heart, we call it "changing her mind". If Trump does it, however, he is a gummy bear chewin, rotten nosed, phone answerin', coffee wastin', cheatin', liar butt head! I think this is accurate and non-hypocritical... stop laughing! :p
I thought it was called "evolving" when a candidate comes out against the war she started & funded?
Or when she deigned to allow offending God & oppressing Xians by no longer opposing gay marriage?
Our language does change so.
 

Lyndon

"Peace is the answer" quote: GOD, 2014
Premium Member
I don't ever support candidates because of honesty.
While that's an admirable trait personally, what matters is what they'll do in office.
Sample issue....
I know Hilda will raise my taxes.
It doesn't matter if she admits this or lies to me about it.
I just don't want her to do this.

But sometimes candidates do things which warrant discussion.
People must learn to discern between what matters for voting, & what matters for carping.

I'm pretty sure you're not part of the richest 1 %, so no, Hillary is not going to raise your taxes!!
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I thought it was called "evolving" when a candidate comes out against the war she started & funded?
Or when she deigned to allow offending God & oppressing Xians by no longer opposing gay marriage?
Our language does change so.
It only changes when it involves my beliefs (and those who support it) as to make sure it is received in the best way possible. The world revolves around me, ya know!
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Hillary should well know that cover-ups almost never work, and she shoud have taken Kaine's approach when asked about Hillary's e-mails, namely admit she made a mistake, say she'd ever do such a stupid thing again, and then ask for forgiveness-- Americans accept that kind of approach and plus we tend to have a very short memory.
 
Top