Crystallas
Active Member
The best cameras now have a hard enough time taking a picture of a flag 5 miles away, let alone 240,000 miles away!
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Did man really land on the moon 1969?
- Thread starter Ori
- Start date
Engyo
Prince of Dorkness!
You are talking about in atmosphere. In a vacuum, where there is little to impede the travel of photons, such considerations change considerably. If the operators of a satellite based camera could be persuaded to point it at one of the many landing sites, images could be captured which wouldn't leave any doubts. Unfortunately, the operators of such cameras usually don't subscribe to such doubts in the first place, and so are liable to look on such an exercise as a big waste of time and money.Crystallas said:
Fluffy
A fool
Really? Perhaps you need to check up on the recent announcement of the world's first photograph of an out-of-solar-system planet then. And that is mere lightyears away.
Well not if you are a Cold War enthusiast. Not if you care that the first time man went onto the moon WASN'T with Apollo 11. But yes it does take some of the impact out of it all.
painted wolf
Grey Muzzle
the first photo of an extra-solar planet shows a nice fuzzy blob... 
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/04/01/extrasolar.planet.photo/
not a lot of detail... From what I have heard...and I heard it from someone who did it. You can given a powerful enough telescope see the flag on the moon. I personally havent seen it, I don't have a nice telescope.
Anyway here is a list of objects on the moon and where most of them are located... should you have access to a telescope powerful enough to see them
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/List-of-artificial-objects-on-the-Moon
wa:do
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/04/01/extrasolar.planet.photo/
not a lot of detail... From what I have heard...and I heard it from someone who did it. You can given a powerful enough telescope see the flag on the moon. I personally havent seen it, I don't have a nice telescope.
Anyway here is a list of objects on the moon and where most of them are located... should you have access to a telescope powerful enough to see them
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/List-of-artificial-objects-on-the-Moon
wa:do
Ardent Listener
Active Member
Several years back there was a television that gave many examples of "evidence" that we did not land on the moon. NASA refused to debate their findings. I have never seen that program in re-runs, though you often see re-runs of UFO shows.
Years ago, I use to work at the Kennedy Space Center and was a very strong supporter of the space program. After viewing that program, I have serious doubts that we ever landed a manned space craft on the moon.
Maybe the question should be; If we did not land a man on the moon would you really want to know?
Years ago, I use to work at the Kennedy Space Center and was a very strong supporter of the space program. After viewing that program, I have serious doubts that we ever landed a manned space craft on the moon.
Maybe the question should be; If we did not land a man on the moon would you really want to know?
