Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am anti-abortion too. But I am also pro-choice. I want to try to make their as few abortions as possible. That is why I support planned parenthood.
why not adoption
Because neither one is one hundred percent effective. People sometimes try abstinence and fail. If a person cannot remain abstinent then that method fails. That is why the teen pregnancy rate is so high in Texas, a state that often teaches abstinence only.I think Jesse makes sense in his criticism of political factions and their impracticality and shortsightedness, but I don't think abortion should be considered as any sort of solution. Contraception and abstinence. What it boils down to is, for the most part, irresponsible sexual practices. In cases where abortion would be a last ditch effort why not adoption. That is by no means perfect but it's better than abortion. Still, it's a problem of society. Christians and society have different approaches on the subject and neither should try and enforce their position on the other.
Because neither one is one hundred percent effective. People sometimes try abstinence and fail. If a person cannot remain abstinent then that method fails. That is why the teen pregnancy rate is so high in Texas, a state that often teaches abstinence only.
Do you think abstinence, birth control and adoption would be preferable to abortion? What kind of women are more prone to have abortions as a solution. Students, young career oriented, single, poor, rape victims? For me this is just a topic of discussion. The Christians have their perspective and society outside of the Christian congregation have theirs.
Yes, preferable. But people are not perfect. There will always be a need for abortions. The ideal is to lower that number by offering appropriate services. It is more immoral to ban abortions than to have them legal in my opinion.
And I am betting that Christians are more apt to have abortions because too many of them are taught that birth control is a sin. Or it is "proof" that one is sinning.
I think once the nervous system comes "online" life at that point should be sacrosanct. My issue concerning abortion will always be revolved around the ability for the fetus to perceive and feel pain.I have been rethinking my position. I think last resort choice is okay, but we should discuss safe sex education, Medicare for all, contraceptive choice, and all of that before we quote get rid of the baby as a first resort, because scientifically, it is a human life. For the record, I am a moderate democrat. Peace. Oh, and when two human lives are involved, one has to be moderate on abortion. I wont show them here, but I saw the pictures, and researched the science. It's a human life, but i tend to agree with many of the points made in this video. What are your thoughts?
I think Jesse makes sense in his criticism of political factions and their impracticality and shortsightedness, but I don't think abortion should be considered as any sort of solution. Contraception and abstinence. What it boils down to is, for the most part, irresponsible sexual practices. In cases where abortion would be a last ditch effort why not adoption. That is by no means perfect but it's better than abortion. Still, it's a problem of society. Christians and society have different approaches on the subject and neither should try and enforce their position on the other.
Orphanages are full of kids now; how many have you offered to take in?
Yeah, you may be right. Just nip it in the bud. Kill 'em before they're born. Everybody f#@k. We can kill 'em before they're born.
Should be the choice of the person carrying the fetus without judgement or prejudice.
Yes it should be, and it should be their responsibility before it gets to that point, and the responsibility of someone in educating them.
Not arguing that point with you as I agree. However, bottom line it's still the mother's decision alone. This is entirely no one else's business no matter how much it offends your sensibilities.
I agree with you, ultimately it is the mother's decision, and it should be but I think the father should have something to say about it and you can't really expect society not to have something to say about it, and I think it's an important thing to discuss.
Everything is upside down. One quick way to gain political support is to claim to oppose abortion -- even if you really don't. Abortion was not a political issue until Jerry Falwell.and his cronies were empowered by television. Nobody believes in truth anymore. It used to be that people knew that money corrupted religions. Now anybody who pays lip service to God gets the support of the churches, and its perfectly fine for ministry to live in cushy mansions and to leave their ministries to their children as heirlooms. The pro-life 'Plank' is rarely stepped out outside of election time, but during election time they will tap dance on it. They won't denounce the evils of the ministries, and the ministries in turn support them. Its back scratching. Its indulgences all over again.I have been rethinking my position. I think last resort choice is okay, but we should discuss safe sex education, Medicare for all, contraceptive choice, and all of that before we quote get rid of the baby as a first resort, because scientifically, it is a human life. For the record, I am a moderate democrat. Peace. Oh, and when two human lives are involved, one has to be moderate on abortion. I wont show them here, but I saw the pictures, and researched the science. It's a human life, but i tend to agree with many of the points made in this video. What are your thoughts?
What if the 'father' had raped the girl? Could he say that the girl must carry the fetus to term, give birth, and be responsible for raising his child for the next 18 years?