Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What purpose was it suppose to serve? As far as humour or comedy it had nothing to offer.
As far as religion it made no sense as Christ died for humans!
May be the confusion was the issue?
One of the goals of comedy is to take that what is familiar (in this case Wyle Coyote and Christianity), and putting them in unfamiliar situations (a proselytizing coyote). A part of the comedy comes from the lack of expectation for a coyote to be talking about Jesus.As far as religion it made no sense as Christ died for humans!
Hilarious! A satirical spin to such identify-mission-fulfillment ponderings, a spoof on meaning and purpose, and a comical way to get us asking some serious questions about ourselves.
One of the goals of comedy is to take that what is familiar (in this case Wyle Coyote and Christianity), and putting them in unfamiliar situations (a proselytizing coyote). A part of the comedy comes from the lack of expectation for a coyote to be talking about Jesus.
That right there lets me know you're taking it too seriously. Comedy isn't serious. It is the absurd. It is bad timing. It is situations you know aren't going to turn out well. The Three Stoogies? Three grown men slapping each other around? The entire slapstick genre is based on dullards or very lucky SOBs and way over exaggerating things.However it rather questions the mindset of those who have no regard to human life being of value. Christianity cannot in any way apply to Wyle Coyote or Road runner and the cartoon cannot in anyway relate to the giving of a life for the sake of mankind.
Why not? The Willy Coyote has been chasing Road Runner for generations now. Why can't someone see this and think "wow, just what would I do if my life's obsession was finished?"No one can seriously think a cartoon about two animals can cause any person to ask serious questions about themselves.
This isn't even a public poll. People can vote and not say anything. Or are you disappointment that more people are finding it funny than not?The other problem is the religious verses non-religious element. This will affect the outcome of the poll. Because one will vote in accordance of the 'personality contest' of voting regarding those they like or don't like what they say. You won't get a true reflection whilst the readers are a mixed bag in the same place when posting on other subjects together.
Ditto.Clever and real with a great premise to start.
It serves all the functions that humor is supposed to serve.
I suspect that some Christians without a developed sense of self-directed humor might find it offensive. But, taking offense is generally a sign of an overdeveloped and fragile ego.
Why not? The Willy Coyote has been chasing Road Runner for generations now. Why can't someone see this and think "wow, just what would I do if my life's obsession was finished?"
]
That right there lets me know you're taking it too seriously. Comedy isn't serious. It is the absurd. It is bad timing. It is situations you know aren't going to turn out well. The Three Stoogies? Three grown men slapping each other around? The entire slapstick genre is based on dullards or very lucky SOBs and way over exaggerating things.
Why not? The Willy Coyote has been chasing Road Runner for generations now. Why can't someone see this and think "wow, just what would I do if my life's obsession was finished?"
Has he really? Where in real life do you see such things happen amongst these animals? You don't because the whole thing is not a possibility.
What life obsession's do cartoons really have? Reflecting capabilities and thought patterns onto cartoon characters is not natural or good.
This isn't even a public poll. People can vote and not say anything. Or are you disappointment (disappointed) that more people are finding it funny than not?
It appears you are the one who is disappointed your reply shows how serious you take something others do not find funny as being plausible funny or to contain real humour.
Road runner is like Marmite you either dislike or love it.
The road runner was boring the same old thing and he never succeeded once watched never watched again it is boring. Marrmite once tried you will never eat it again or want more.
Seems you cannot allow for people to have a different view from yourself without it being about right and wrong.
Seriously! how could anyone find road runner to be educational or even dramatically funny. It is the most boring set of cartoons ever made.
My children never grew up watching such rubbish. Personally, my life's obsession had never been the catching of road runner or thinking it to be funny.
Yes. And there are many ways to achieve this end. One key element of this is situation and context, because saying something mean could be to hurt, or it could be a good natured and mirthful roast.Comedy is about HUMOUR/HUMOR.
Have you never watched Bugs Bunny, Tom & Jerry, or even the OP featured Wylie Coyote & The Road Runner (though the OP was a Family Guy spoof/parody).Grown men slapping each other around bears no humour to a child
Though considered dated, there is much comic gold to be found in the slapstick genre.Violence is not comedy and under no circumstances can any slapstick comedy which includes violence be funny.
So? Comedy isn't concerned about what is real. It gives us the unlikely, the improbable, and the unexpected. If it's ordinary, it's not funny. If it's extraordinary, it's still not funny unless there is something "off" enough about it to make you laugh. Such as, in Dear White People, when the one guy says "Maybe we should do what they did in Germany." That line was hilarious because of course people expect "do what they did in Germany" to mean Nazis, especially when racial issues are involved, but, no, total surprise of a line that shocks only to lead to something completely innocent and unexpected with the way we are trained to think about "Germans and race" in such a context.Has he really? Where in real life do you see such things happen amongst these animals? You don't because the whole thing is not a possibility.
They are characters, so they have as much as they are given. Obviously, the coyote really desperately wants to catch this road runner. It's the entire premises of the show. Of course it's not real, but nor is the crew of the USS Enterprise and we can give some detailed bibliographical information about many of the crew members. Data isn't real, but yet we know his goals are to better understand and emulate human behavior, and be more accepted into human society. We even know he knows this goal is not possible to fully achieve, but "the effort yields its own reward."What life obsession's do cartoons really have? Reflecting capabilities and thought patterns onto cartoon characters is not natural or good.
You're the one who is insisting this cannot be funny. I'm not taking it seriously at all, but rather trying to help explain how things that are absurd and impossible are both funny and a part of comedy.It appears you are the one who is disappointed your reply shows how serious you take something others do not find funny as being plausible funny or to contain real humour.
I can say I used to chase after things I can't have, but I've hit a point in life where I am just fine paddling a leaky canoe to make fun of a yacht. And, BTW, it wasn't catching the road runner that made it funny - it was the coyotes sense of loss of direction and new found reason for living.Personally, my life's obsession had never been the catching of road runner or thinking it to be funny.
Yes. And there are many ways to achieve this end. One key element of this is situation and context, because saying something mean could be to hurt, or it could be a good natured and mirthful roast.
Have you never watched Bugs Bunny, Tom & Jerry, or even the OP featured Wylie Coyote & The Road Runner (though the OP was a Family Guy spoof/parody).
Though considered dated, there is much comic gold to be found in the slapstick genre.
So? Comedy isn't concerned about what is real. It gives us the unlikely, the improbable, and the unexpected. If it's ordinary, it's not funny. If it's extraordinary, it's still not funny unless there is something "off" enough about it to make you laugh. Such as, in Dear White People, when the one guy says "Maybe we should do what they did in Germany." That line was hilarious because of course people expect "do what they did in Germany" to mean Nazis, especially when racial issues are involved, but, no, total surprise of a line that shocks only to lead to something completely innocent and unexpected with the way we are trained to think about "Germans and race" in such a context.
They are characters, so they have as much as they are given. Obviously, the coyote really desperately wants to catch this road runner. It's the entire premises of the show. Of course it's not real, but nor is the crew of the USS Enterprise and we can give some detailed bibliographical information about many of the crew members. Data isn't real, but yet we know his goals are to better understand and emulate human behavior, and be more accepted into human society. We even know he knows this goal is not possible to fully achieve, but "the effort yields its own reward."
You're the one who is insisting this cannot be funny. I'm not taking it seriously at all, but rather trying to help explain how things that are absurd and impossible are both funny and a part of comedy.
I can say I used to chase after things I can't have, but I've hit a point in life where I am just fine paddling a leaky canoe to make fun of a yacht. And, BTW, it wasn't catching the road runner that made it funny - it was the coyotes sense of loss of direction and new found reason for living.
Who said anything about giving you this stuff from and academic and scholarly view? I love comedy. I'd even give stand up a try if there were any places around here for it.Thanks for the reply shadow wolf, but no one needs to be educated on the scholarly approach to humour because humour is not taught and neither is it set in rigid stone of the scholarly view.
I don't expect you to change your mind on it, but yes you do need help explaining it because they very things that make it comedy you are trying to say make it too unrealistic to make it funny. But that's the thing about comedy - absurdity tends to reign supreme, you may need a momentary suspense of belief, and the unexpected and/or grossly over exaggerated are bound to happen. Mel Brooks movies are about the furthest thing from reality and plausible scenarios as you're going to get with live action movies, but that's part of what makes them so hilarious. Chappelle pumping his Nikes up during Medieval Europe times, a western flick that literally takes place at a movie studio, or the first choir being composed of cavemen bashing each other's feet with rocks to produce notes, it is these unrealistic over-exaggerated and absurd things that are part of the reasons his movies are so funny. And then of course, twice, "A black sheriff?!?" LOL! It's also a great formula for making fun of the bad aspects of society, such as racism.It wasn't funny to me and nothing you say can in any way change that fact. Being educated in religious matters and human matters, especially of those of mental health and sociology I can tell you
that I don't need an explanation as to why others might find it funny.
We seem to have taken two different paths. My life of pain and agony, comedy is a great relief. And of course even I see reality as more important than fiction, but yet it is psychologically healthy to occasionally have an escape.But then, having seen a lot of sad and painful things in life, I see things of reality more important than a made up scenario.
Who said anything about giving you this stuff from and academic and scholarly view? I love comedy. I'd even give stand up a try if there were any places around here for it.
I don't expect you to change your mind on it, but yes you do need help explaining it because they very things that make it comedy you are trying to say make it too unrealistic to make it funny.
But that's the thing about comedy - absurdity tends to reign supreme, you may need a momentary suspense of belief, and the unexpected and/or grossly over exaggerated are bound to happen.
Mel Brooks movies are about the furthest thing from reality and plausible scenarios as you're going to get with live action movies, but that's part of what makes them so hilarious. Chappelle pumping his Nikes up during Medieval Europe times, a western flick that literally takes place at a movie studio, or the first choir being composed of cavemen bashing each other's feet with rocks to produce notes, it is these unrealistic over-exaggerated and absurd things that are part of the reasons his movies are so funny. And then of course, twice, "A black sheriff?!?" LOL! It's also a great formula for making fun of the bad aspects of society, such as racism.
We seem to have taken two different paths. My life of pain and agony, comedy is a great relief. And of course even I see reality as more important than fiction, but yet it is psychologically healthy to occasionally have an escape.