Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Difference of scriptures. The scripture of Judaism is the Hebrew Bible (What Christians also refer to as the Old Testament). The Islamic scripture is the Qur'an.Hi,
What are the most striking differences according to you?
Perhaps this is a failure on my part, but I do not see how Islam can avoid a reliance on a belief in direct revelation and the inerrancy of its scripture.
Let me suggest a [possibly naive] question: Can one be a Muslim without believing that the Qur'an was (a) revealed to the Prophet Muhammad by the angel Gabriel, and (b) that the Eid al-Adha sacrifice celebrated by Muslims references an historical fact? I ask this because I as a Jew do not require the prophets to be either inerrant or flawless, nor do I require the Akedah to be anything more than immensely rich folk lore / etiology. Similarly, see Did the Exodus Really Happen? by Rabbi David Wolpe.Could you elaborate a bit on that?
Can one be a Muslim without believing that the Qur'an was (a) revealed to the Prophet Muhammad by the angel Gabriel
I don't know.that the Eid al-Adha sacrifice celebrated by Muslims references an historical fact?
The most striking difference would be the acceptance of the Prophet Jesus and Mohammed(peace be upon them and there families).Hi,
What are the most striking differences according to you?
I've heard more than a few rabbis 'accept' Jesus in much the same way as they might 'accept' one of the lesser prophets, but never as a god or an inerrant messenger of God.The most striking difference would be the acceptance of the Prophet Jesus and Mohammed(peace be upon them and there families).
I've heard more than a few rabbis 'accept' Jesus in much the same way as they might 'accept' one of the lesser prophets, but never as a god or an inerrant messenger of God.
I would agree.Like i said before i belief that Judaism is the closest to Islam compared with other religions out there..
I've heard more than a few rabbis 'accept' Jesus in much the same way as they might 'accept' one of the lesser prophets, but never as a god or an inerrant messenger of God.
Jesus doesn't have a religious significance in Judaism, but then again neither does Einstein. So, there you have it, two remarkable Jewish men who aren't idolized in any way by their people... sounds pretty healthy.I am told repeatedly by Jews that Jesus has no religious significance in Judaism. He has no standing in any sect. If anything he is considered a false prophet.
OK.I am told repeatedly by Jews that Jesus has no religious significance in Judaism. He has no standing in any sect. If anything he is considered a false prophet.
I am told repeatedly by Jews that Jesus has no religious significance in Judaism. He has no standing in any sect. If anything he is considered a false prophet.
Hi,
What are the most striking differences according to you?
An interesting point, reflecting the different historical roles of the two belief systems. Paleo-Judaism was central to Israelite ethnogenesis....; and the unique covenental structure of Judaism as opposed to the universalist or proselytizing nature of Islam.
While I've never heard an official endorsement of the New Testament from any Rabbi, I've heard a great many claim that we can, and should, learn from various aspects of Jesus' message. A lot of what he taught could easily be seen as being relevant to Judaism today as Orthodoxy faces some of the challenges he had with the Pharisees in the New Testament story.
From my own personal experience with the NT, what Jesus advocates isn't necessarily contrary to or abhorrent in Judaism, and may even be necessary. However, I think that what he taught isn't particularly new to Judaism.
That said, the story the NT tells of him is, in my opinion, a pretty decent and concise way of putting something that would otherwise require a lot of study of Tanakh.
For someone who seeks to incorporate more liberal thought in the realm of traditional practice, what Jesus teaches is, to me anyways, quite enlightening.
That strikes me as being more than a little naive and lazy. No?Just reporting what I generally hear in internet discussions.
That strikes me as being more than a little naive and lazy. No?
I have no knowledge of who told you, how many told you, whether you understood what they told you, or whether you are honestly communicating what they purportedly told you.No. Neither. Do all the opinions of all the Jews who have told me this not count?
I have no idea, and I fully suspect that you have less. But if you insist on claiming a superior understanding of the Jewish position you are obviously free to do so.Do they not represent the majority of how Jews think?
None that I know of. Why do you ask?Or do rabbis normally give sermons about Jesus in shul?