Yeah. Mostly because it makes sense. The whole "birds are dinosaurs" movement is not nearly as young as people think. It has been proposed since the earliest days of paleontology, we'd just never found anything indicating feather impressions until relatively recently.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
dinosaurs never existed. The dinosaur fossils were created by paleontologist scam artists.
- Thread starter superdestructionyou
- Start date
- Status
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Then make your own and find wealth and fame in doing so. Just pretend you were out digging in a field and found something. Call your local museum or university, as I'm sure they would be eager and willing to assist you. If these things are so easily faked, you'll have your name shining in the next day's newspapers and maybe even a plaque mentioning you as the finder in a museum or university exhibit. If it's all really that easy, go do it. Afterall, they say those who can do while those who can't teach.
Because it's easier to fill it with your own bull**** that way.
Oh, you mean that whole fiasco with archaoraptor? I already knew about that. The bones used to make it come from other dinosaurs.
I took a look at the uploader's other videos, and can pretty safely conclude that this guy is an unreliable source of information. Therefore, if I had actually cared to watch the video, I can be pretty certain I wouldn't retain any of the information, since I'd take it about as seriously as Flat Earth claims.
From that same link (right at the top, actually):
Zhou et al. found that the head and upper body actually belong to a specimen of the primitive fossil bird Yanornis.[1] A 2002 study found that the tail belongs to a small winged dromaeosaur, Microraptor, named in 2000.[2] The legs and feet belong to an as yet unknown animal.[3][4]
Your own source betrays your position.
Last edited:
I have pictures of some if you wanna see.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Purusha
Member
Why do you have to put down everyone and why would you bother with the uploader. I had watched the video with my headphones on and it is clear, just that audio is little low from speakers
But those are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, contrary to what the name "Terrible Lizard" implies, are not reptiles. Their legs are directly beneath them, not splayed out like turtles, crocs, lizards and such.These closely related guys obviously never became birds:
These closely related guys obviously never became birds:
Neither did most non-avian dinosaurs.
Ouroboros
Coincidentia oppositorum
Except those who have seen them firsthand. Or those who have seen them still in the rock, before being extracted.
That's your right to have doubts. Perhaps you should contact some researchers in the paleontological field of studies who could take you and show you some originals? That might help you change your mind. Without you personally seeing and touching it firsthand, there's no argument or reasoning that can persuade you. It doesn't matter if someone here on this site have done it and tell you this, because you will only believe your own eyes. Correct?
Ouroboros
Coincidentia oppositorum
Was archaeopteryx also a fraud?
Seriously, the only reason I can think of to hold to these kinds of beliefs is just to be different for difference's own sake. "EVERYONE just takes for granted that dinosaurs are real, so I'm not going to because I don't wanna be a sheep like them!"
I can understand that urge, since I'm kind of a hipster, but even I don't take my desire to be different to these levels.
I can understand that urge, since I'm kind of a hipster, but even I don't take my desire to be different to these levels.
[QUOTE="superdestructionyou, post: 4772507, member: 59977"
We've explained that fossils are mineralogically different from the strata they're found in.
You need to watch your links more carefully, and pay attention to contradictory evidence from other posts.
I'm the one requesting the link -- and this link does not say the fossil is sandstone. It says the fossil was found in sandstone.
We've explained that fossils are mineralogically different from the strata they're found in.
You need to watch your links more carefully, and pay attention to contradictory evidence from other posts.
'Cause that's how bored I am. LOL
More seroiusly, I like to think of it as an opportunity to hone in my research skills, and perhaps even double-check facts and findings I always took for granted but might now be long outdated.
There are fossils with clear impressions of feathers.
ThirtyThree
Well-Known Member
Some of them still with preserved pigments! Which is awesome because it means we know what color some ancient dinosaurs were. My favorite being the Microraptor find. Four winged dinosaur with glossy black feathers.
You keep forgetting: THEY'RE ALL FAKES!
It doesn't matter how many there are, or what details they have, because ALL of them are fakes by the International Paleontology Cartel, Inc., LLC!
- Status