• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

do anyone need further explanation


  • Total voters
    31
Status
Not open for further replies.

Altfish

Veteran Member
It must be a multi-billion pound/dollar/euro industry, I've found fossils in Dorset and there are millions of them there,
How do I apply for a job with these guys?
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
@idav
don't know and i don't care.
could figure as much. cause then why are paleontologists just bringing more ape skulls instead of monsters and myths, why because we can't create real monster fossils

Your claim is copying something that actually exists, so as you inferred as much in previous posts. The real thing has to exist before you can copy it.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
but there are no signs of manufacture to the naked eye...I am certain that it does not have any sort of realistic internal structure, etc., and would not pass as anything other than fake, though...
Right thats the idea, cause we examine this stuff, and in paleontology people are weary of anyone who would bring forth any extraordinary missing links, and would have to pass rigorous scrutiny by several institutions.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
Right thats the idea, cause we examine this stuff, and in paleontology people are weary of anyone who would bring forth any extraordinary missing links, and would have to pass rigorous scrutiny by several institutions.
paleotologists agree with whatever other paleontologists claim and most of what paleontologists teach is what Joseph Liedy said about the fossils and how they fossilized. Paleontologists do not question other paleontologists finds or claims. They instead only seek to try to argue with religious people quoting whatever other paleontologist say or claimed to have researched. Most paleontologist only know the basic principles of fossilzation. If you look online you will notice that almost every site repeats the same claim on evolution and things that deal with paleontology and sadly their knowledge is very limited and based on what other paleontologist based on what joseph liedy, o.c marsh,edward cope and C.H sternberg said about fossization. Most of the things claimed by joseph liedy has never been questioned or examined. Joseph Liedy is the one that start the fossil hoaxing of dinosaurs and was the leader of O.C marhs, edward cope and C.H sternberg. So no none of the fossils found by the four paleontologist have never been examined esp. up close. All every paleontologist know is that the fossils are made out of sandstone rock sediment that occured thru fossization but fossization cannot but the fossils instead were created using molds and cement and sand. No paleontologist or any type of scientist has been able to fossilize a bone. The fossils found by joseph liedy and his accomplice are not allowed to be cut up and examined.
 
Last edited:

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
with the advanced technology scientist should be able to turn a bone into a fossil. The dinosaur and prehistoric fossils are sandstone fossils.
You're basically saying that scientists should be able to somehow artificially reproduce every naturally occurring phenomenon - even the ones that take thousands of years - in no time flat, and very easily using "science".

I make an awesome "fruit" leather (think fruit-roll-up) out of rhubarb. I have to wait for it to grow in its specific season(s), harvest the stalks, chop them up, boil them down with sugar and a few other ingredients, blend the results in a food processor and then put them in a dehydrator for 10-12 hours. What you're saying is that, using "science" I should somehow be able to skip all sorts of steps in there and just produce the leather without it. So... who needs the growth process - why wait? USE SCIENCE INSTEAD! Who needs to wait for the drying for 10-12 hours... JUST REPLACE THAT TIME WITH "SCIENCE"! Heck.. who even needs the plants in the first place? I'll just skip everything and CONVERT SCIENCE INTO RHUBARB LEATHER! I can't believe I never thought of this before.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
You're basically saying that scientists should be able to somehow artificially reproduce every naturally occurring phenomenon - even the ones that take thousands of years - in no time flat, and very easily using "science".

I make an awesome "fruit" leather (think fruit-roll-up) out of rhubarb. I have to wait for it to grow in its specific season(s), harvest the stalks, chop them up, boil them down with sugar and a few other ingredients, blend the results in a food processor and then put them in a dehydrator for 10-12 hours. What you're saying is that, using "science" I should somehow be able to skip all sorts of steps in there and just produce the leather without it. So... who needs the growth process - why wait? USE SCIENCE INSTEAD! Who needs to wait for the drying for 10-12 hours... JUST REPLACE THAT TIME WITH "SCIENCE"! Heck.. who even needs the plants in the first place... I'll just skip everything and convert SCIENCE into rhubarb leather! I can't believe I never thought of this before.
fozzilation wouldn't be hard to accomplish based on the process they claim. I can create a legit dinosaur fossil in an hour mixing cement and sand.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
fozzilation wouldn't be hard to accomplish based on the process they claim. I can create a legit dinosaur fossil in an hour mixing cement and sand.
Completely untrue. The "process they claim" is the one that takes compound numbers of years to be accomplished. What you could create in an hour would be nothing like actual fossils. Heck - even I have found fossils before - randomly, in the middle of nowhere special. Who is creating and (assumedly) profiting off of those?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
file.php

Screen_shot_2013-06-10_at_9.37.55_AM.png
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
I found this very helpful:
sorry but i don't watch childrens cartoons that fail not only in being a legit cartoon but fails in comedy as well. The directors of that cartoon should of quit a head of time and started scrubbing toilets. The artwork itself is terrible and the cartoon promoted racism and hatered.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
Completely untrue. The "process they claim" is the one that takes compound numbers of years to be accomplished. What you could create in an hour would be nothing like actual fossils. Heck - even I have found fossils before - randomly, in the middle of nowhere special. Who is creating and (assumedly) profiting off of those?
what kind of fossils did you find. We are talking about dinosaur fossils and not organisms with shells as shells are different than bone

scientist have never been able to show this process below or do this process to create a fossil though if it were real with advanced technology and equipment they should be able to. .
sdasdsddssd.JPG
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
what are shells made out or animals that have shells

Seashells are the exoskeletons of mollusks such as snails, clams, oysters and many others. Such shells have three distinct layers and are composed mostly of calcium carbonate with only a small quantity of protein--no more than 2 percent. These shells, unlike typical animal structures, are not made up of cells.

oh but it had to be ME to point this out as other scientist ignored to point this out. Now we know that trust and creditability of the science community is shrinking every time i reply.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
so...

Now we know that trust and creditability of the science community is shrinking every time i reply.

No, actually I think your suffering form a bit of deluded hubris there.... your credibility was in doubt before, but at this point it is non existent. You are no threat at all to the science community at all..... your complete lack of anything remotely close to science is blatantly obvious to virtually anyone who reads this thread..... I have wasted enough time on your inanity....have fun tilting at windmills
 

Theweirdtophat

Well-Known Member
haven't you heard of making up a lie. Oh i found this dinosaur fossil in an earthquake and I'M A PALEONTOLOGIST and most people believe it.

Just because you can make fossils, doesn't mean THESE fossils are fake. I don't know why people think the earth is only a few thousand years old, when other fossils and artifacts and so forth are WAY older and the earth is way older than people think. Now there are fossils of giants as well as some would call mythological beings, but museums and others don't like to bring that up either. They don't bring up the fact they found skeletons 15 ft long, people with enlarged cone-heads and skeletons of little people. Dinosaurs were here. Cavemen were here. Don't tell me you think cavemen don't exist. Did you think we started out advanced? We were primitive and had to start somewhere

I personally believe, especially with some tablet and other evidence, seems to indicate that there was intervention in our lives and we were primitive and then the first civilization occurred which was Sumer. Many scientists and others have yet to explain why cavemen who barely knew tools all of a sudden had a concept of science, magic, politics and civilization. We had help. From what you call the gods which were out of this world. But then dinosaurs were around long before civilization ever occurred.

I highly doubt every one of those fossils, whether they were dug up, found in earthquakes or in tar pits, are all fake.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
Just because you can make fossils, doesn't mean THESE fossils are fake. I don't know why people think the earth is only a few thousand years old, when other fossils and artifacts and so forth are WAY older and the earth is way older than people think. Now there are fossils of giants as well as some would call mythological beings, but museums and others don't like to bring that up either. They don't bring up the fact they found skeletons 15 ft long, people with enlarged cone-heads and skeletons of little people. Dinosaurs were here. Cavemen were here. Don't tell me you think cavemen don't exist. Did you think we started out advanced? We were primitive and had to start somewhere

I personally believe, especially with some tablet and other evidence, seems to indicate that there was intervention in our lives and we were primitive and then the first civilization occurred which was Sumer. Many scientists and others have yet to explain why cavemen who barely knew tools all of a sudden had a concept of science, magic, politics and civilization. We had help. From what you call the gods which were out of this world. But then dinosaurs were around long before civilization ever occurred.

I highly doubt every one of those fossils, whether they were dug up, found in earthquakes or in tar pits, are all fake.
you are basing it on assumptions
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
fozzilation wouldn't be hard to accomplish based on the process they claim. I can create a legit dinosaur fossil in an hour mixing cement and sand.

Then do it.

In fact, go one further. Put it in the ground, and wait for it to be dug up. See how long it takes for it to be labeled as a hoax.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Over the many years of finding fossils people were actually trying to prove the bible right but accidentally proved evolution instead. So creationists could have planted Nephilim and given evolution a run for their money. No all these theists could think of making is missing links? That conspiracy is laughable, lets not pretend these were a bunch of atheists finding these fossils, mainly theists who really truly wanted to find Giant Nephilim not giant lizards.
 

superdestructionyou

i will win YOU WILL LOSE
Then do it.

In fact, go one further. Put it in the ground, and wait for it to be dug up. See how long it takes for it to be labeled as a hoax.
you know by saying it you are kind of encouraging me to actually do a video of making a dinosaur fossil . I just feel too lazy to do it. But if you keep on advising me I just might do a video.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
you know by saying it you are kind of encouraging me to actually do a video of making a dinosaur fossil. I just feel too lazy to do it.
Plenty of us do casting and things of the sort. I know how much detail can be REPLICATED from an actual original. There are far more criteria than just what the naked eye can see especially when someone is claiming a high priced item, whether it is a jewel a fossil or whatever. Being able to replicate anything, thats great, I wouldn't recommend trying to sell something for more than its worth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top