Darwinism uses luck to create new information, that violates the natural laws: due to holding of laws, no new information can be added.
That’s BS.
What we “law” as used in science, is only a single statement that provide a very brief overview of proportion that explain how the phenomena might work. Law only provide minimal detail, like quoting or highlighting a point given in a theory.
But a law is only only tiny proportion of explanation that are part of larger explanations of Scientific Theory.
The theory would provide more detailed or more complete explanations than any law.
People who study basic physics, will have learned of Newton 3 laws in Newton’s Law of Motion. Each law only has 1 sentence, highlighting a specific salient point.
But Newton’s Mechanics (which is a Scientific Theory, in his work titled Mathematical Principles Of Natural Philosophies or in Latin, Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, 1687) is a lot larger work that fully explained all the details that the law don’t even mention.
Laws are only tiny parts of scientific theory, and they don’t explain everything. One or 2 sentences in law isn’t a full explanation.
And they (laws) can be subjected to changes, if there are new evidence and new information.
But Newton’s theory on motion and theory on gravity don’t provide all the necessary explanations that required to explain what science have discovered since the 20th century, that Newton didn’t know about.
Albert Einstein expanded both Newton’s theories with something about motion and gravity Newton never dream of explaining, because Newton was limited by his current technology.
Einstein’s theory on Special Relativity expanded the mechanic of motion to include objects that approach the speed of light. Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence equation provide
And Einstein’s theory on General Relativity, not expanded understanding of gravity, it provide new framework that other physicists have added in areas of astronomy and astrophysics (including physical cosmology) that Newton had no answers for.
And just as Newton have equations that provide mathematical proofs of gravity, it is now, more or less, outdated, with Einstein’s 10 field equations, that just about every astrophysicists and cosmologists used for their own models.
Currently, it is Einstein’s General Relativity that is standard model on gravity, not Newton’s theory on gravity. But at some point in the future, someone may crack and replace Einstein’s GR, with even more comprehensive model with quantum theory on gravity, or “quantum gravity”, which would combined General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics together as an unified theory.
Einstein’s tried to unify GR & QM into a single theory before he died, but even his genius was stumped.
As to evolution, it does follow the law of nature, and evolution explain the fact of population diversity of life over time, some through Natural Selection, some through Mutations, some through Genetic Drift and Genetic Hitchhiking, and even some through Gene Flow.
Each of these mechanisms have already been tested and verified to be true.
Charles Darwin was the pioneer of Natural Selection Evolution didn’t know about the other mechanisms, but other biologists have the theory to include these newer mechanisms, as well as expanded his original theory, to include the knowledge of molecular biology, DNA & RNA, and improved testings that Darwin never thought of.
Natural Selection is still essential mechanism in the theory of Evolution, and haven’t been debunked like you and other creationists pretend to be, just only the level of dishonesty of their tactics and propaganda.
The only way to prove creationism (or its offshoots, eg Intelligent Design) to be true, is to provide actual real-world evidence to the concept of God or Designer, particularly existence, which are pathetically lacking.
There is no evidence that dust can be instantly and magically transformed into a living human, as adult man. This defied all law of nature. God did it or the Designer designed it, without evidence are nothing more than superstitious assertions, devoid of all reality.
All we get from creationists, are apologetic excuses, evasions, logical fallacies of all sorts, absurdly ridiculous analogies, propaganda, misinterpretations of not only science but also deliberate misinterpretations of the scriptures that they claimed to be holy and inerrant.
