Do creationists accept biology?

[Subduction Zone]

Unless you think they are using sticks or stones, you can be sure science based technology is involved six ways from Sunday.

Elementary.

:LMFAO! No, you made an apparent false claim. You need to support it with valid resources.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What happened with the Cambrian explosion? Are there signs of burgeoning newly evolving animals as in micro changes in whatever animal forms there were, resulting little by little in other forms? Please do elucidate, if you will, with evidence, not hearsay from others who make assumptions (draw conclusions as if the fossils "prove" evolution). Show the evidence of micro-macro changes, by that I mean the little changes leading to very big changes (differences) in organisms, thanks.

I do not have the time to teach you the basics. And here is someone that can do it far better than I can:

Part II to follow.

 

[dad]

:LMFAO! No, you made an apparent false claim. You need to support it with valid resources.

Ask anyone if killing babies is done with scientific equipment.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ask anyone if killing babies is done with scientific equipment.

It is your claim, you need to support it. I doubt if you can find any.

You need to find a reliable source. Not some wacko site. They have to clearly state that killing babies is being done for science.

Hop to it dad! Hop! Hop! Hop!

 

[dad]

It is your claim, you need to support it. I doubt if you can find any.

You need to find a reliable source. Not some wacko site. They have to clearly state that killing babies is being done for science.

Hop to it dad! Hop! Hop! Hop!

Not for science...but using science in the deed.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not for science...but using science in the deed.

Now that makes even less sense. I don't think even you know what you were trying to say there.

You still need a valid source. Remember, non-wacko source. Must clearly state that babies are being killed for science.

Hop, hop, hop dad.

 

[dad]

Now that makes even less sense. I don't think even you know what you were trying to say there.

You still need a valid source. Remember, non-wacko source. Must clearly state that babies are being killed for science.

Hop, hop, hop dad.

The thread is not about what science is involved in clinics. So creationists accept biology as far as it goes. That would not include TOE.

 

[YoursTrue]

I do not have the time to teach you the basics. And here is someone that can do it far better than I can:

Part II to follow.

Again, an artist's imagined depiction of the imagined.

 

[YoursTrue]

Now that makes even less sense. I don't think even you know what you were trying to say there.

You still need a valid source. Remember, non-wacko source. Must clearly state that babies are being killed for science.

Hop, hop, hop dad.

Human embryos are not babies, right? They are only on the road to becoming babies, given the opportunity, is that right?

 

[YoursTrue]

Ask anyone if killing babies is done with scientific equipment.

@SZ - are abortions done with scientific equpment?

 

[Subduction Zone]

The thread is not about what science is involved in clinics. So creationists accept biology as far as it goes. That would not include TOE.

One cannot separate biology from evolution anymore than one could separate physics from gravity.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Human embryos are not babies, right? They are only on the road to becoming babies, given the opportunity, is that right?

To possibly being babies. Killing an embryo is not killing a baby. Smashing an acorn is not cutting down a tree.

 

[Subduction Zone]

@SZ - are abortions done with scientific equpment?

I believe most may be done with chemicals today. Just as they were in the Bible, but much safer.

EDIT: Hmm, the number is not yet over 50% nationally but it is approaching that and in some states is the main source:

Number of chemical abortions growing in U.S., outpacing surgical abortions in many states - NRL News Today

By the way, are you anti-abortion? If that is the case you should be pro-Planned Parenthood. Do you know why?

 

[dad]

I believe most may be done with chemicals today. Just as they were in the Bible, but much safer.

EDIT: Hmm, the number is not yet over 50% nationally but it is approaching that and in some states is the main source:

Number of chemical abortions growing in U.S., outpacing surgical abortions in many states - NRL News Today

By the way, are you anti-abortion? If that is the case you should be pro-Planned Parenthood. Do you know why?

Both surgery and chemicals and drugs involve science of course..

 

[Subduction Zone]

Both surgery and chemicals and drugs involve science of course..

So what? Are you going to put your money where your mouth is and avoid all products of science? That would mean that you could not post here. By your rather faulty logic since abortions rely on science on your computer relies upon much more science you are a strong supporter of abortions.

 

[YoursTrue]

One cannot separate biology from evolution anymore than one could separate physics from gravity.

Not exactly true. While biology may examine certain things, evolutionary scientists may examine and form opinions about some things, they are not the same. Now here's a scene for a science fiction book: let's take dna from a (dead) chimp on its way evolving as fossil scientists may have realized it, and then grow it in a lab and see what turns up. LOL! OK? Now if you want to write a sci-fi story about that, go ahead, people's heads may shwim. And you could earn a few dollars. Let's pretend a chimp or "close relative" was found on its way to developing into another lifeform, such as whatever humanoid type being is said to come before homo sapiens.
I'm not sure what "Dad" believes, I'm just asking you to see what you think.

 

[YoursTrue]

So what? Are you going to put your money where your mouth is and avoid all products of science? That would mean that you could not post here. By your rather faulty logic since abortions rely on science on your computer relies upon much more science you are a strong supporter of abortions.

Obviously you must believe that evolution in humans produces a form of morality, don't you? Or do you?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Again, an artist's imagined depiction of the imagined.

No, watch the video.

Didn't you object to the fact that there are no honest creationists? You are confirming my claim.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not exactly true. While biology may examine certain things, evolutionary scientists may examine and form opinions about some things, they are not the same. Now here's a scene for a science fiction book: let's take dna from a (dead) chimp on its way evolving as fossil scientists may have realized it, and then grow it in a lab and see what turns up. LOL! OK? Now if you want to write a sci-fi story about that, go ahead, people's heads may shwim. And you could earn a few dollars. Let's pretend a chimp or "close relative" was found on its way to developing into another lifeform, such as whatever humanoid type being is said to come before homo sapiens.
I'm not sure what "Dad" believes, I'm just asking you to see what you think.

What? Please try to post a coherent concept.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Obviously you must believe that evolution in humans produces a form of morality, don't you? Or do you?

Why do you think that morality can't evolve?