Bartholomæus;3480282 said:
I actually only said its evidence for some people. For myslef its clear evidence. But you do realise you arguement goes both ways! You don't have concrete evidence of evolution, its only a theori. Even the farther to evolution (charles darwin) admitted that in his book. The fact remains we have never seen anything come from nothing. 0+0=0 0*0=0 0-0=0
It's not evidence in any way, it's a belief that can't even be called evidence.
And the argument does NOT go both ways, you have proven yourself to lack basic scientific education as to not know what a scientific theory is; it is not a theory as in an idea, a scientific theory has to be backed up by a massive amount of REAL evidence to be as accepted as evolution is.
And I can already tell you've been reading Eric Hovind or Kent Hovind since you've taken their quote and twisted it just like they did, here's the full Darwin quote:
"To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree."
And here's the bit AFTER that which you lot always leave out:
"Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself first originated; but I may remark that several facts make me suspect that any sensitive nerve may be rendered sensitive to light, and likewise to those coarser vibrations of the air which produce sound."
Darwin continues with three more pages describing a sequence of plausible intermediate stages between eyelessness and human eyes, giving examples from existing organisms to show that the intermediates are viable.
Your move. :cigar:
