How about this scenario? Take someone who hits someone with a baseball bat, rapes a child, enjoys torturing animals/humans, kills at random. How does this compute with the sufferer being the sinner and the attacker who has sinned not suffering? Or maybe you have another definition of a sinner?
A sinner is whom makes mistakes (ie. not following God's laws). Everything is reward and punishment, on the receiving end. Trials and tribulations are that which should be welcomed because they move us back to the correct path and cleanse our souls of blemishes.
If God runs the show, how could anyone receive any suffering they
don't deserve? Surely, God is just?
Interesting theory.
How does it work for those who do not sin?
To sin is to make a mistake ("chet" in Hebrew, "to miss the mark"); who of us does not make mistakes daily?
It's kinda cute how the abrahamic religions incorporate sadomasochistic fetishism into their faith. It's also an irrelevant notion to those who aren't of those faiths and should have no baring over their own rights and choices.
You must first learn about reward and punishment before you pass such judgement. Justice is not sadomasochism.
So someone in terrible agony wants a merciful death and you say its better to suffer now,you'll thank me for it later,nothing like a loving religion is there.
This world is the lowest of all the worlds. In the world after death, if you face gehinnom, the pain of cleansing the soul of sin is much greater. It is better to suffer in this world than in the next, even if both pain (here and there) are temporary.
Seriously? I didn't realize there were fire & brimstone Jews.
Reward and punishment is not new.