exchemist
Veteran Member
Certainly from the Catholic perspective I don't think there is any issue. It is not sinful to allow nature to take its course. When my wife was dying of cancer in hospital, the nurses asked her about it and, through her wall of drugs and the mental confusion of her fading powers she scribbled rather wildly "no resusc" on several post it notes. (I only found this out clearing her room after she had gone - it must have happened while I was not there. Or perhaps she wanted to spare me being involved in the question.) The same issue came up when my mother was dying of a massive stroke. We had a family consultation and said no, if she starts going, let her go. There is a time when intervention has to stop.When my husband (72) came home from hospital on Monday after having a possible TIA, on which the jury is still out, we had a serious discussion. He said that if he had a major stroke he would not wish to be resuscitated. He reckons he has lost so much after his brain haemorrhage in 2006, which trashed half his brain not being able to do the things he can still do would be a fate far worse than death. We have discussed it with our children and they agree that his wish should be upheld.
Are there any posters on this forum who for religious reasons disagree with a person having the right to request not to be resuscitated if it became necessary?
Although he intended it ironically, I quote Arthur Hugh Clough: "Thou shalt not kill, but needst not strive officiously to keep alive."
P.S. My 91 yr old father, by contrast, after 2 strokes and loss of the use of his legs, says he is quite happy in his nursing home, continues to get something out of his heavily circumscribed life, and does want to be resuscitated if his heart stops. So that's what we've told them.