I just mean that you and your experiences are worthless to Jews.
Similar to what was said to the prophets, and look what happened after... Understandably it is easier to attack the messenger, than deal with or answer the original question.
Now what if he isn't any of those things?
Can systematically show across the Tanakh what has been stated, based on numerous specifications fitting exactly.
Is it at all possible that you're guilty of what you are accusing the Jews of?
Excellent question, and thank you for questioning it... I'm completely open to being shown any new information, any better way of comprehension; yet based on all evidence the case fits.
Where would anyone even begin to come up with such a bizarre load of nonsense?
Within The Tanakh, and can post all the scriptures substantiating the ideas.
Isaiah 11:1-2 A shoot will come out of the stock of Jesse, and a branch out of his roots will bear fruit. (2) Yahweh’s Spirit will rest on him: the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of Yahweh.
Which “prophecies” are you referring to?
This is a huge question, we're talking a large percentage of the prophets are about this...
So for instance, the real reason for the diaspora according to the prophets, the shepherds of the flock were murdering prophets, and refusing correction by God; thus God sent his own Messiah as explained in Zechariah 11, Ezekiel 1-7, Jeremiah 25, Daniel 9... The shepherds than kill the Messiah, and the flock is scattered because of this.
What I've heard from Jews about their reasons for the diaspora, have nothing to do with the contexts explained in the Tanakh, and instead the shepherds have tried to maintain control by lying to the flock; thus God shall remove them, and keep out of the flock those whom are worthwhile (Ezekiel 34, Jeremiah 23).
Within Rabbinic thinking there is the concept of "the Messiah", which is a specific king who shall reign in the Messianic age....
Yet simply within the Tanakh, this can be shown with numerous prophecies that indicate the same events in much more detail.
which has never been a name, let alone a masculine name.
Each of you puts this same argument forward..... First off his full name is Yehoshua as we find in Zechariah 3 about him specifically.
Then symbolically it isn't just a name, so the idea of it needing to be one is missing the point.
Isaiah 52:10 Yahweh has made bare his holy arm in the eyes of all the nations; and all the ends of the earth have seen the salvation of our God (Yeshuat Eloheinu).
Psalms 98:1-3 A Psalm. Sing to Yahweh a new song, for he has done marvelous things! His right hand, and his holy arm, have worked salvation for him. (2) Yahweh has made known his salvation. He has openly shown his righteousness in the sight of the nations. (3) He has remembered his loving kindness and his faithfulness toward the house of Israel. All the ends of the earth have seen the salvation of our God (Yeshuat Eloheinu).
Thus we're seeing a manifestation from the Lord....Yeshua is also said to have been a common shortened version of his full name Yehoshua.
The God of Israel has never appeared in human form
Genesis 3:8 YHVH walks.
Genesis 18 he eats with Abraham.
Exodus 33:20 he has a face, and a back.
See this is what i mean about invented theology, the book says one thing, and since coming back from Babylon there appears to be confusion taught.
As saying previously the God Most High (El Elyon) is without form; yet even the name Yah-havah Elohim means the Lord to (physically) Become.
