Do the Jews Have a God?

[wizanda]

Can a concept be carried out? Can a concept be met?

A concept can be born according to Isaiah... To me a concept can be anything someone sets out as their description of a matter.

Concept comes from the Latin to conceive.

Proper English Versus Slang

Depends on the way it is used, once it becomes part of a sentence; you can hear it sounds grammatically better to say correctly, rather than use proper.

 

[rosends]

A concept can be born according to Isaiah... To me a concept can be anything someone sets out as their description of a matter.

Concept comes from the Latin to conceive.

That's nice. Irrelevant and non-responsive, but nice.

Depends on the way it is used, once it becomes part of a sentence; you can hear it sounds grammatically better to say correctly, rather than use proper.

A thing does not sound grammatically better or worse. One applies the rules of grammar to it and it is right or wrong. It might sound more awkward to someone, and less so to others. In this case, the construction is neither incorrect nor "common" as you put it. Notice that I referenced a grammar site using the construction ("Slang Is Not Proper English"). Also, the point you claimed wasn't about the word "correctly" vs. "proper."

 

[Jedster]

That's nice. Irrelevant and non-responsive, but nice.

A thing does not sound grammatically better or worse. One applies the rules of grammar to it and it is right or wrong. It might sound more awkward to someone, and less so to others. In this case, the construction is neither incorrect nor "common" as you put it. Notice that I referenced a grammar site using the construction ("Slang Is Not Proper English"). Also, the point you claimed wasn't about the word "correctly" vs. "proper."

@wizanda comes from Nottingham, where they don't speak proper correct English properly, I mean correctly.
As a former lecturer to many students from many countries, I can honestly say that my English-born students were the worstest in the English language as regards grammar.

 

[RESOLUTION]

Ezekiel 34:23-24, Jeremiah 23:5, Ezekiel 37:24-25, Jeremiah 30:8-9, Hosea 3:5, Isaiah 55:3, Isaiah 22:22, Isaiah 9:6-7, Revelation 5:5, etc.

Do you not think everyone can see what you are doing.
Posting what God says about David himself with what he promised about David descendant Jesus the Messiah?
Don't know if you knowingly post trying to muddy the waters or if you really just copy and paste from somewhere else not
realising what you post.
Why not display some personal knowledge?

 

[wizanda]

Posting what God says about David himself with what he promised about David descendant Jesus the Messiah?

If you read the context of of them, these are the prophesied Messiah for the Messianic age appointed by God, and it declares in both Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea that it is literally David, and in Isaiah, Revelation it says of the line of David.

There is nothing wrong with Yeshua being a reincarnated (Gilgul) version of David, as it fits with a lot more prophecy then...

David in the Psalms is called the son of God, Yeshua saying it's his house of prayer, and it's his House, then makes far more sense when he is also David, and the spirit of the Lord is upon him.

If Yeshua is not David, how can we make Jeremiah 23, and Ezekiel 34 fit with the expectations in the Synoptic Gospels, and Revelation?

The Lamb is of the Line of David, which is no longer even known genetically; yet to be a reincarnation of David means the prophecy fits.

Please explain why you don't think Yeshua is David, and will try to answer scripturally where these ideas are.

 

[RESOLUTION]

If you read the context of of them, these are the prophesied Messiah for the Messianic age appointed by God, and it declares in both Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea that it is literally David, and in Isaiah, Revelation it says of the line of David.

There is nothing wrong with Yeshua being a reincarnated (Gilgul) version of David, as it fits with a lot more prophecy then...

David in the Psalms is called the son of God, Yeshua saying it's his house of prayer, and it's his House, then makes far more sense when he is also David, and the spirit of the Lord is upon him.

If Yeshua is not David, how can we make Jeremiah 23, and Ezekiel 34 fit with the expectations in the Synoptic Gospels, and Revelation?

The Lamb is of the Line of David, which is no longer even known genetically; yet to be a reincarnation of David means the prophecy fits.

Please explain why you don't think Yeshua is David, and will try to answer scripturally where these ideas are.

If you cannot understand the simple things I have stated and you twist things into what they are not.

What is shown is you have only what you think others have said.

You have nothing...

 

[Searching1981]

You guys are seeing history happen, now that people have seen miracles out there people from all corners of the world will claim to see miracles, own the truth and pretend to be miracle makers. Hold onto your religious texts before they are changed (Torah, Bible, Book of Mormon, Quran, Gita's and Sutras)

Let me tell you about the Renaissance. People like Michelangelo were good people but they were skeptical people. So, when they depicted Jesus Christ as having long hair and a beard it was a criticism of Christ (who is clean shaven) and not a celebration. Why? Because the bearded long hair people running around at the time always behaved as if they were God, so clearly this Jesus guy (who I love and know is the Son of God) has to be one of THOSE people. Now we seem them in atheists and they still do believe they are God. So beware for long hair and a beard, I never trusted them in life and still don't.

 

[Ingledsva]

... Let me tell you about the Renaissance. People like Michelangelo were good people but they were skeptical people. So, when they depicted Jesus Christ as having long hair and a beard it was a criticism of Christ (who is clean shaven) and not a celebration. Why? Because the bearded long hair people running around at the time always behaved as if they were God, so clearly this Jesus guy (who I love and know is the Son of God) has to be one of THOSE people. Now we seem them in atheists and they still do believe they are God. So beware for long hair and a beard, I never trusted them in life and still don't.

Good grief! You have no idea how Jesus wore his hair.

Today in the NT we get Jesus of Nazareth -

But it was more likely they meant - Jesus the Nazirite, - like Samson the Nazirite.

Jdg 13:5 For, lo, thou shalt conceive, and bear a son; and no razor shall come on his head: for the child shall be a Nazarite unto God from the womb: and he shall begin to deliver Israel out of the hand of the Philistines.

Jdg 13:24 And the woman bare a son, and called his name Samson: and the child grew, and YHVH blessed him.

And THAT is probably why we always get passed down pictures of Jesus with long hair.

*

 

[Katzpur]

People like Michelangelo were good people but they were skeptical people. So, when they depicted Jesus Christ as having long hair and a beard it was a criticism of Christ (who is clean shaven) and not a celebration.

Oh my gosh. The "facts" some people come up with on this forum...

 

[wizanda]

If you cannot understand the simple things I have stated and you twist things into what they are not.

You didn't explain anything, and clearly struggled to comprehend it....

So having just explained the prophetic text, and then asked a question that makes us realize the text can't add up without making a conclusion Yeshua is physically David.

The next step is for the ego to be dismissive or the harder option is to try questioning the things it has never heard before.