HonestJoe
Well-Known Member
No, gamers (and many others) make reasonable arguments against the assertions that games cause violence and crime. Countless millions of people play these games, which are increasingly popular and increasingly realistic, yet there is no measurable increase in related violence or crime (if anything, the correlation tends to go the other way, however coincidentally).Whenever the question of if video games contribute to a culture of violence is brought up, all of the gamers simultaneously shout down the question.
I wouldn't claim to know what the parents themselves think or know, but in their justified grief, I could understand them lashing out at any identifiable targets to blame. The lawyers who are actually bringing the cases don't have that excuse, and are just seeking to get as much money as possible.The Uvalde parents seem to think there is a connection. They are suing the makers of Call of Duty over their perceived connection to inspiring the shooting.
I doubt they'd be able to win in court against the makers of a video game on any general principle and would have to prove some specific actions by that specific company to demonstrate any valid case. Of course, they could still get some money in a settlement by the company to avoid the inevitable negative media coverage.
For the vast majority of people, that simply isn't the case though. Similar claims have been made about violent films and roleplaying games, but if you look for any actual evidence of generalised causal links, you will come up empty. You might be able to pick out individual cases, but not ones where games can be identified as the sole, or even primary, factor.I wanted to ask your thoughts on the question. I think violent video games obviously desensitize people to overt violence. In games like Grand Theft Auto you can go on mass shooting sprees freely. It is made to be fun.
I think violent video games negatively contribute to a culture of violence.