Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
With the hitler example, your speaking physiological (that may be misspelled) but it wouldn't be that simple, for that to be accurate it would have to be pyschological as well ...such as the same personality traits. However let's say, if I'm understanding your point correctly, that when the time comes to make choices if the choices are already decided and therefore out of our control as to the types of choices, still the ability to chose one choice and not the other is an exercise in free will.Tawn said:My view is that every decision you take is a result of a precise 'arrangement' if you will of your experiences, psysiology and the particular circumstance you find yourself in.
Think of it in the same light as rolling a die onto a table. The die roll isnt truly random.. or free to turn up on whatever side it 'likes'.. the side it turns up on is a direct result of the precise dimensions of the die, the position it was thrown from and the power and spin with which it was thrown, the surface conditions of the table. If thrown from those infinitely precise conditions again, it will turn up the same every time.
For example, if I eat a lot of fish oils, it has been shown to improve concentration. THis may help me in analysing information, thus affecting the decisions I make. In fact there is strong evidence to link mood and psychology with diet.
It is nonsense to say that we choose our diet. Not all of us do - in fact most of us dont. Arguing that the person who prepares the food makes a choice is also nonsense.. we either all have free choice or none of us do. However, who chooses exactly how the food grows? This is all determined environmentally.. effectively it becomes an infinitely complicated chain of cause and effects.. see the butterfly effect.
Again, if I have had a traumatic experience it will also affect my decisions. I only say traumatic because these have the most obvious results on our decision making processes - but I think every single little experience we have, if it is even slightly memorised, will have an effect upon certain decisions we make.
Likewise, change even a small attribute of the situation we are faced with and it can effect our decision.
Dont take it as if I am saying that we dont make decisions and choices. We do, but the answers we will arrive at are an inevitable result of all the above factors. Much like the die. It seems to be random, but it actually an inevitable result of the exact conditions of the roll.
Humans are like computers. We are theoretically[/b] predictable.. though this isnt always straightforward, most people do act in predictable ways. We collect information, process it and act on it.
Look at it like this. If you were born as hitler, with hitlers genes and had hitlers experiences, you would live your life the exact same way.
Freedom is one of the essential human rights. The first question I may ask, are we born to be free? Do we have a free will?capthowdy said:I'm making this thread to continue a debate I engaged Tawn in, over if free will does truly exsist. If anyone else has any thoughts on the subject then your posts are welcome. Anyways where were we?
Tawn said:My view is that every decision you take is a result of a precise 'arrangement' if you will of your experiences, psysiology and the particular circumstance you find yourself in.
Think of it in the same light as rolling a die onto a table. The die roll isnt truly random.. or free to turn up on whatever side it 'likes'.. the side it turns up on is a direct result of the precise dimensions of the die, the position it was thrown from and the power and spin with which it was thrown, the surface conditions of the table. If thrown from those infinitely precise conditions again, it will turn up the same every time.
For example, if I eat a lot of fish oils, it has been shown to improve concentration. THis may help me in analysing information, thus affecting the decisions I make. In fact there is strong evidence to link mood and psychology with diet.
It is nonsense to say that we choose our diet. Not all of us do - in fact most of us dont. Arguing that the person who prepares the food makes a choice is also nonsense.. we either all have free choice or none of us do. However, who chooses exactly how the food grows? This is all determined environmentally.. effectively it becomes an infinitely complicated chain of cause and effects.. see the butterfly effect.
Again, if I have had a traumatic experience it will also affect my decisions. I only say traumatic because these have the most obvious results on our decision making processes - but I think every single little experience we have, if it is even slightly memorised, will have an effect upon certain decisions we make.
Likewise, change even a small attribute of the situation we are faced with and it can effect our decision.
Dont take it as if I am saying that we dont make decisions and choices. We do, but the answers we will arrive at are an inevitable result of all the above factors. Much like the die. It seems to be random, but it actually an inevitable result of the exact conditions of the roll.
Humans are like computers. We are theoretically[/b] predictable.. though this isnt always straightforward, most people do act in predictable ways. We collect information, process it and act on it.
Look at it like this. If you were born as hitler, with hitlers genes and had hitlers experiences, you would live your life the exact same way.
James,IacobPersul said:Peace,
You seem to think Angels have no free will. Is this true in Islam (I really don't know) because it certainly isn't in Christianity. It's clear for us that Angels were created with free will because otherwise none of them could have rebelled against God. It's true that those we call Angels now all show allegiance to God, but those we call demons (the fallen Angels) clearly do not.
I believe both humans and Angels have free will (though not complete freedom) and I apologise to anyone else if my question to Peace seems a little off topic. I'm terribly unconvinced by the no free will opinions. If everything is so deterministic why is it that identical twins are not more alike?
James
You are welcome JamesIacobPersul said:Peace,
Thanks for your answer. I hadn't realised that the Islamic belief in angels and demons was so different to ours.
James
Well yes.. your lifetime sum of experiences, genetics and physiology would determine that... but yeah..capthowdy said:With the hitler example, your speaking physiological (that may be misspelled) but it wouldn't be that simple, for that to be accurate it would have to be pyschological as well
Depending on how you define free will.. but in the same way a computer which is programmed to respond to certain input in certain ways because of its programming is making decisions, and hence free will.. but that isnt, I think, the general understanding of free will.However let's say, if I'm understanding your point correctly, that when the time comes to make choices if the choices are already decided and therefore out of our control as to the types of choices, still the ability to chose one choice and not the other is an exercise in free will.
Absolutely. Who we are is determined by external and internal forces - not any sense of free will. We can sometimes choose to change ourselves, but that is because of a particular experience which makes you question the way you are.michel said:"My view is that every decision you take is a result of a precise 'arrangement' if you will of your experiences, psysiology and the particular circumstance you find yourself in."
I'll go along with that, to some extent, but your experiences, Psychology ? - are what make us into who we are as individuals.
No, the nature of genetics means that nobody is born as an 'empty slate'. We have already developed a unique physiology and to an extent a unique psychology. We already have latent aptitudes for certain things, even if we never make proper use of them in the future.I think that there is a distinct flaw in what you are saying; I would have thought that your argument would mean that we would have to be 'clones' mentally, of our parents - do you think we are ?
Correct, I do not think a computer can have free will at all.Tawn said:but in the same way a computer which is programmed to respond to certain input in certain ways because of its programming is making decisions,
Yes I think thats the case. Of course our minds are constantly reviewing past information and it is possible for some experiences to become lost or even completely forgotten. Sometimes the timing of a situation can affect the decision made.justa_gurl said:Tawn,
would you say that we are unable to separate ourselves from our experiences when making a decision?
Two people with the same past experiences, psychology, physiology, genetics etc.. yes.. because they are essentially the same person.would you say that any two people, when given the exact same information, would come to the same conclusion?
Okay. Just to clarify; Is it possible for any two people to have the exact same timing, external influences, past experiences, psychology, physiology, genetics... in which to come to the same conclusion?Tawn said:Yes I think thats the case. Of course our minds are constantly reviewing past information and it is possible for some experiences to become lost or even completely forgotten. Sometimes the timing of a situation can affect the decision made.
Two people with the same past experiences, psychology, physiology, genetics etc.. yes.. because they are essentially the same person.
This is all metaphysics to me, but, for these things to be exact, would it not be required for the two people to occupy the same space and time up until the point of this conclusion you speak of?justa_gurl said:Okay. Just to clarify; Is it possible for any two people to have the exact same timing, external influences, past experiences, psychology, physiology, genetics... in which to come to the same conclusion?