I don't know any other way to understand what you said. What reason do you claim that "Mexican" judges such as judge Curiel are generally biased against people with bright yellow hair such as Trump?
You're rephrasing what I said, & changing the meaning dramatically.
Try again.
If not, is there some reason you don't want to answer the questions I asked in the OP?
I don't have enuf info to answer those questions, since I'm not familiar enuf with the exact situations, campaign strategy, or what other pols should do.
I opined about what I know.
You didn't have to inform me of that. I asked you what sort of punishment you think judges should receive for issuing decisions that you disagree with.
It's a devious loaded question, ie, you make a false presumption about a basis for punishing judges.
So I offered an opinion which addresses the question you should've asked instead.
Sanctioned how? What are your criteria for determining when a judge has "demonstrat[ed] incompetence, prejudice or corruption"?
It's beyond the scope of this thread to address the process of sanctioning judges, eg, The Judicial Tenure Commission in MI.
(But I can tell you that they've never contacted me personally to see if I agree or disagree with a judge's decision.)
The vast majority of judges in the US do not violate the judicial Code of Conduct, do they? Judges do not "often" violate the Code, and do not have a "propensity" for violating the Code. Do they?
I cannot speak to whether a majority do.
(That would quantify things more than I'm able.)
I say that I observe misconduct in court on occasion, often because of bias.
Because of this, it makes sense to do what one can to avoid judges with a
greater likelihood of ruling against one because of a bias or other problem.
