Sand Dancer
Currently catless
That's why I don't have much attention to detail.I personally do not believe there is a literal devil; although I have heard it said that the devil is in the detail.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's why I don't have much attention to detail.I personally do not believe there is a literal devil; although I have heard it said that the devil is in the detail.
By understanding that Job is a fictitious story that is designed to teach. Stories quite commonly will insert characters as a literary device.That strikes me as more convenient than helpful. How, for example, does such a view enrich one's understanding of the Balaam story or, for that matter, the entire book of Job?
Well said.By understanding that Job is a fictitious story that is designed to teach. Stories quite commonly will insert characters as a literary device.
Which makes them literary, not literal.By understanding that Job is a fictitious story that is designed to teach. Stories quite commonly will insert characters as a literary device.
Yes.Which makes them literary, not literal.
The name of Lucifer (morning star) is in the KJV in relation to the king of Babylon, and the morning star was referred to by Peter:I have no basis. So far as i know, the titles of Devil and Lucifer are exclusively Christian in origin. It just seems as though these names are interchangeable with Satan. Now that you brought it to my attention, perhaps i have been mistaken about this.