Caladan
Agnostic Pantheist
Wouldnt that get you bonus points?What if you get drunk, hop in your car, and then run over a crowd of children at a crosswalk?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wouldnt that get you bonus points?What if you get drunk, hop in your car, and then run over a crowd of children at a crosswalk?
I think what happens with most of us is we remember the times our feelings of guilt have been spot on, but forget the times they've been ridiculous. Moreover, most of us don't look very closely at senseless guilt -- we simply dismiss it before it's grown and has a memorable impact on us. But I am convinced that were you or most anyone else to take a close and dispassionate look at the all the times you experience guilt over the course of a couple weeks, you would find that far and away most twinges of guilt are useless as moral guides. Perhaps you should try keeping a journal for a few weeks -- as I have done -- in which you record each instance of guilt you feel. I'm pretty sure when you re-read your journal at the end of two or three weeks, you will see most experiences of guilt are not good guides to morality.
What if you get drunk, hop in your car, and then run over a crowd of children at a crosswalk?
As I said, I think you are right that many people feel guilt for unnecessary things. But you are also right to mention that these times, we come to realize they are ridiculous... the very fact that keeping a journal may highlight them shows that. The guilt we feel that is justified, tends to stay with us...and is very useful.
Why do we feel the guilt that tends to stay with us is justified? I would submit we feel that way because we are judging guilt against some other moral compass than guilt itself. In other words, we don't need guilt to know what's moral and what isn't, nor can we rely on guilt to tell us what is moral and what isn't.
Why do we feel the guilt that tends to stay with us is justified? I would submit we feel that way because we are judging guilt against some other moral compass than guilt itself. In other words, we don't need guilt to know what's moral and what isn't, nor can we rely on guilt to tell us what is moral and what isn't. As a moral guide, guilt is useless.
Not for me it isn't. It has made me the person I am.
As I said, the watch analogy is irrelevant. The brain processes out the invalid guilty feelings, and you are left only feeling guilty for things you feel are important. A very good moral guide if you ask me.
Why do I feel it is justified? We all feel certain guilt and shame for things we have done. If that feeling remains then at least you yourself must feel it is justified, even if it isn't.
Then be happy, my friend! But what works for you apparently does not work for me. I guess we must leave it at that.
I am convinced you have misunderstood the point I made, and consequently, are not addressing it. Perhaps this will help you see the point: The very fact the brain processes out the invalid guilty feelings is evidence that guilt is not needed as a moral guide.
But the key here is to identify why I -- or anyone else -- would feel some guilt is justified. Surely there is nothing about guilt itself that tells us whether a feeling of guilt is justified? If you wish to argue that, then we will simply need to agree to disagree because that plainly contradicts what I have myself observed.
Of course the way we process guilt is very personal, and unique to each of us, but I can only go from experience and the feelings of guilt that persist in my consciousness.
Justification is also personal. A man who runs down a child who runs from nowhere may be totally innocent...He wasn't speeding, he wasn't daydreaming. The child appears and *bang* The man will almost certainly feel unjustified guilt. But this is an extreme example.
A simpler example, and personal to me...
Most children do some nasty things to small animals and insects...I was no different, magnifying glass on ants, pulling legs off spiders etc... But a very poignant time in my life, and one I regard as a bit of a "coming of age", is when I picked up a small frog, and shoved its head into a pile of mud. I was around 10 at the time. The frog screamed (like a baby). I pulled it out and threw it in the water. From that moment on I realized the importance of not only not mistreating animals, but also the importance of life itself, my own life, and everyones around me. I still feel guilty for what I was doing, and without a doubt that guilt gave me a very valuable moral lesson.
Nowadays, as I mentioned, I really don't feel guilt where it isn't necessary, at least not for more than a fleeting moment, and then it is gone.
Back to the OT, I am sure many people who manage not to act on carnal desires outside their relationship do it not only out of a sense of duty, but out of a sense of guilt. I have cheated in the past, and the day after I felt so bad I vowed never to do it again. It is a feeling of guilt, for something I know is wrong that gave me that moral lesson. And unless I am strangely unique, I am certain it works that way for many others.
Plagiarism plain and simple. :sorry1:Excuses! Excuses! You could have plucked out your eyes
As a person with a partner, whether married or not, do you feel guilty when you have mental desires for other people other than your partner?
Do you think this is a sin? Do you feel the need to repent, or feel dirty?
Some people would need to repress, pervert and stifle their natural inclinations in order to only love one person in their lives, though. I don't think that's the optimal course of action for them.
Please allow me to repeat myself, Bill, as a favor to you. As I said in an earlier post, guilt, like a broken watch, is sometimes right. But it's not right often enough to be reasonably considered a moral guide. This has been my observation of my own feelings of guilt -- perhaps your own close and dispassionate observations would differ.
*Puts on UPS shorts & shirt,chaps door of beautiful brunette in Dallas Area*
:flirt:
try & be *more ready* next time he presents himself(there will surely be a next time)
No to all of the above.
Desire is a manifestation of being alive. To enjoy it is to live.
This.No to all of the above.
Desire is a manifestation of being alive. To enjoy it is to live.