atofel said:
Chaos is a discription of great complexity. It means something is so complex, we can't effectively untangle it. However, at the granular-level, it does not suggest things do not operate according to some absolute mechanism.
Particularity is something different. It means it is one way instead of another.
I don't understand. Are you saying that something that is "chaotic" can't be "particular"--or, using your definitions, something that has "great complexity" cannot be "one way instead of another"?
atofel said:
So how did particularity originate without a selective force?
Okay, I think I see what you're saying. I agree, things are the way they are because certain forces/relationships/laws in the universe selected for the present conditions. Then of course you're going to say "what selected for those laws?" Then of course I'm going to say "what selected for the gods?" And around and around we go.... :woohoo:
atofel said:
I do not think God is a particularity, but rather an absolute. He is an infinite being that is opposite to nothingness. He is the origin and author of all particulars.
Or, maybe there are no gods, but rather laws and proportionalities in the universe which are absolute, and which give rise to all "particulars". Both explanations account for the existence of "particulars", though the latter doesn't appeal to unevidenced and unknowable entities.