@djhwoodwerks why won't you explain how you know the Bible has been kept pure ie all right, nothing wrong in it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I understand "all scripture inspired of God" might mean (to some people - not me) that GOD inspired each word. I am not aware of any promise of God
to keep each inspired word pure.
@djhwoodwerks why won't you explain how you know the Bible has been kept pure ie all right, nothing wrong in it?
I agree with you!Actually, if you think about it, Paul wrote that to Timothy. What was the Scripture to Paul? The only Scripture they had, our Old Testament. Paul wasn't referring to the New Testament, it hadn't been written yet.
I see God is True. I see the Bible is not God. There is ONE GOD. To be saying the Bible is true and is able to lead a person is to replace God with it.
To do so is a sin imho.
What would it take for God to make the people who chose the books and explained the books to be right about everything?Because the God I know, isn't a God of confusion. I don't, and can't believe He would have given His written word and then allow it to be screwed with and say, "oh well, that's not what I meant, but I'll just let them argue about it and try and figure out what I really meant. If they can't figure it out, oh well."
What would it take for God to make the people who chose the books and explained the books to be right about everything?
I think you might think about the difficulty in writing THROUGH people. God would have had to enter all those people who had anything to do with our modern Bible.
NO, I don't believe you believe that. You seem to me to be a person of intelligence. How can you say a lesson must be without error to be useful?The why do you even read the Bible at all? If you believe the Bible has even one mistake, it makes the whole book invalid.
God didn't tell me that. The Bible is missing the verb make. It makes much, much, much, much, much, much ,much, much, much more sense that he said to BE disciples. You have shut off your thinking ability or you are posing.Did God "enter" you when He told you the Bible was wrong for saying, "make" disciples of all nations?
God didn't tell me that. The Bible is missing the verb make. It makes much, much, much, much, much, much ,much, much, much more sense that he said to BE disciples. You have shut off your thinking ability or you are posing.
God didn't tell me that. The Bible is missing the verb make. It makes much, much, much, much, much, much ,much, much, much more sense that he said to BE disciples. You have shut off your thinking ability or you are posing.
Haha. I am not reading into make. Make isn't there to read.I think you are reading way too much into the word "make" when you read it, as if you are thinking it means to 'forcibly make' people disciples.
What is a disciple?
I think you mean this. Djhoodwerks says, "trust in what was written long, long ago and translated with all your heart and on your own understanding do not lean"Proverbs 3:5 (JPS 1917) 5 Trust in the LORD with all thy heart, and lean not upon thine own understanding.
Yes we have been over this many times. The teacher was dead. Maybe they thought they were not his disciples any more because he was dead. So he was reminding them that they WERE still his disciples.g3100. μαθητεύω mathēteuō; from 3101; intransitively, to become a pupil; transitively, to disciple, i.e. enrol as scholar: — be disciple, instruct, teach.
I think you mean this. Djhoodwerks says, "trust in what was written long, long ago and translated with all your heart and on your own understanding do not lean"
Heads up! "Own" was added.
What it used to say is, "Trust in the LORD with all your heart and on understanding do not lean".
Tell me. Are you going to say the Bible has understanding of its own so you lean on its understanding?