people dont listen to howard stern because he is profane, they listen because he presents issues in a way that is natural, and yes profanity is natural. there is also the fact that many people, like me, hate that the government feels the need to protect me from hearing/seeing things that some view as bad, evil, or decadent whether it be an idea or a word.
if you feel something is vulgar, dont listen to it or watch it, thats why all tv sets and radios have the ability to either change the channel/station or turn them off. there are plenty of us that dont think the government or agencies of the government should control, in any way, profanity, nudity, violence, and other such subjects keeping them from being shown, talked about, seen or heard.
and if you haven't guessed it, i do enjoy listening to howard stern, although im not about to subscribe to satellite radio just to listen to him. i also like the explicit lyrics in music, not gonna suscribe to hear those either. both, howard stern's show, and explicit music are a form of art, and to censor it takes away from its value and meaning. the reason im not gonna subscribe is because i only listen to the radio about 1 hour a week.
on a side note anyone ever seen the jimmy kimmel segments titled 'unneccesary censorship'?
here is a link two segments, quite funny if you ask me.
http://thetravisty.com/Just_Funny:Unnecessary_Censorship.wmv
http://thetravisty.com/Just_Funny:Unnecessary_Censorship_2.wmv
Drekmed