Gambit
Well-Known Member
I am saying "I don't know".
Okay.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am saying "I don't know".
By the by, your definition of freewill as "doing whatever it is that you desire to do" rests on acting in accordance with your desires.
So, in a case where you desire to lift one thousand pounds, but can't, this would negate your freewill, all of which brings freewill down to a dependency on physical ability, which isn't what the freewill issue is about---at least not in common parlance.
The freewill issue normally revolves around an attempt to "reconcile an element of freedom with the apparent determinism in a world of causes and effects, a world of events in a great causal chain."* So, the onus is on the freewill advocate to show why the "apparent determinism in a world of causes and effects" is a faulty.
Care to take a stab?
Does God have free will? Is God free to do whatever it is that he desires to do? If so, do we have free will? Are we free to do whatever it is that we desire to do? If not, then why do some (if not most) say that we have been endowed with free will?
Is God free to do whatever it is that he desires to do?
Does God have free will?
If so, do we have free will?
Are we free to do whatever it is that we desire to do?
If not, then why do some (if not most) say that we have been endowed with free will?
Unbounded.
The only way we could have freewill is if we were allowed to be in full control of our actions, influenced by nothing, and that's certainly not the case. Every single even that happens, down to the movement of the atom, has a cause and influences all events to happen.
There must be a reason for doing something, something leading up to that point cause the event. But we are restricted to making 'choices' by everything around us.
If we were not endowed with free will, (thus predestined as individuals), then certain passages of Scripture (at least in both sections of the Bible) would be meaningless. Thus when looking into the future, God must be exercising restraint and being selective. Real choice demands free will although there are boundaries set by our personal power along with the powerful effect of what we have been feeding our minds and hearts with recently.
As an Advaitan Hindu, I think the best answer to your question is ultimately there is only one free-will; God/Brahman. In fact there is only One and we are that One.
However, in our relative reality we have the illusion of free-will. But even our relative reality itself is an illusion..
Of course, the Bible readily indicates that (free or not) God meddles with humanity's will when it suits His Divine Agenda®:
You're not addressing the questions I asked in the OP of this thread. I'm asking a philosophical question, not a biblical one.
I think the problem here is between our free will and destiny.
Like .. create the universe?
Because if God was not obliged to create the universe, then it seems that creationists are obliged to accept at least a 50:50 coin flip on the universe existing as opposed to it not existing. Aren't we lucky to be here if this is indeed the case?
So much for lamely accusing naturalists of having nothing but blind faith in chance.
...
And if God was obliged to create the universe ... what does that say about allegations of his omnipotence?
Perhaps he's simultaneously all-powerful but unable to resist the urge to create? Perhaps a god isn't a god unless creation is involved? Ever heard of a god that created nothing? Perhaps if you're truly perfect, there's no need to create anything? Who knows?
I have to study this further as to why the difference. But I've also read these scriptures as:
"Jehovah allowed Phar'aoh's heart to become obstinate, and he did not listen to them, just as Jehovah had told them." - Ex 9:12
"That is why God lets a deluding influence mislead them so that they may come to believe the lie," - 2 Thess 2:11
Correct, ultimately there is no 'we'. When I used the term 'we' I was trying to relate our reality to the ultimate reality and I may have caused confusion.Then "we" are not co-creators of the script. Because the we is purely illusory.
I don't think I'd put it that way. It is our mind creating the ego that keeps us in the illusion.In fact, belief in free will is what is preventing us from seeing this illusion. Right?
You're ranting.
Why are you saying that God was obliged to create?
Who is forcing God to create?
If God creates because he wants to create, then he is exercising his free will.
We are not free to do whatever we please. But God is. So, why are you saying that we have been endowed with free will by our creator? We haven't. This is clearly a lie.
You're not addressing the questions I asked in the OP of this thread. I'm asking a philosophical question, not a biblical one.
What translation is that? I've searched online for both citations (verbatim) and there are no results. Is it the NRBS?
Here's the logic.I don't see the connection, as it is God that defines the standards of what is perfect.
Under your definition I agree, although it's hardly a notable observation.Yes, that's correct.
First and foremost, I am asking if God has free will. If God does whatever he pleases to do, then God has free will (as I defined it). So, let's address that point first.
Because I figured that you, as an apparent Christian, would advocate freewill. If this isn't the case then so be it.I'm not advocating that we do have free will. So, I fail to see why you are asking me this question.