I feel my question has been misunderstood.
As a former evangelical Christian, I used to believe in Jesus as someone who offered access to a pleasant, everlasting life. But this belief came with a lot of lifestyle demands and restrictions. It required praying, reading the bible, going to Christian gatherings for worship, and it did not allow for sex before marriage, the enjoyment of alcohol or marijuana, or experimenting with psychedelic drugs—among other things. As a sensuous unmarried young man curious about various pleasures in life, I found these restrictions hard to take. For years I felt there was a trade-off I was willing to live with: a promise of a nice everlasting life while denying myself various life pleasures. And then came a time when I didn’t think the trade-off was worth it, and I scrounged around for viable reasons to no longer believe in Christianity. And these reasons were easy to find.
I see the same trade-off in Islam, where people hoping for a nice afterlife are required to pray toward Mecca five times a day, take a trip to Mecca at some point, give alms to the poor, and refrain from the pleasures of premarital sex, alcohol, and eating pork.
In Buddhism, depending on the sect, people may follow the eightfold path, which Wikipedia describes this way: “right view, right resolve, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right
samadhi ('meditative absorption or union'; alternatively, equanimous meditative awareness)”. It doesn’t sound specific about what you can and can’t do, regarding daily lifestyle choices, but it seems to demand a lot in order to achieve nirvana.
Hinduism, full of different traditions and mythologies, puzzles me as to what to do and not to do for some hoped-for spiritual outcome. But I get the sense from Hindus I’ve met that there are trade-offs here, too.
In most religions I’m aware of, what a believer has to consider is whether the requirements of the religion’s beliefs are worth the hassle in order to achieve the hoped-for religious goal. To say a religion is simply “true” is always debatable, as it’s usually based on invisible, unverifiable evidence.
So let’s try again:
I think religion consists of things we want to believe in because we think they will be helpful to us. The things we believe in may or may not bring us daily pleasure, however, because they may include things that are extremely demanding on our thoughts and lifestyle. But we continue to believe because we feel the trade-off is worth it.
Any thoughts on this? Yes? No? Why or why not?