nothing good in the bible is unique .
Yet, somehow, if we examine carefully constructed collections of notable quotations, phrases, maxims, etc., such as
The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, we find that the most popular, most well-known, and most influential contributions to the English language are from the KJV (next comes Shakespeare), that the KJV is not alone in shaping culture and language (the German language was heavily influenced by Luther's translation), and that so influential have various translations of the bible or components of it been (or extensions/conflations of it, such as Tatian's
Diatessaron), that those looking to understand the meaning behind an obscure but very important (for those in fields like Medieval studies, historical linguistics, etc.) refrain in a little known literary piece called
Deor end up concluding that the consistency of the refrain along with some other considerations warrant the belief that a folkloric Jewish tradition based upon the bible (namely, one concerning Solomon and his ring) is the basis for the refrain in
Deor. The bible is the single most influential work in existence. Hardcore atheists like Marx couldn't rid themselves of the teleology of the NT, the Gothic language is known to us virtually solely from a translation of the bible, Latin remained a continuously spoken language unlike Greek because of the Vulgate, the bible provides our best historical sources available for a vast number of historical issues, Newton and those like him spent more time on biblical studies than on the "scientific" work they engaged largely because of the bible, and so on.
The bible redefined religion, including religions that hold the bible to be just another fiction (such as Hinduism). That it is not unique is to echo the proverb "there is nothing new under the sun", which is from the bible.