McBell
Unbound
I am not "suiting myself".
I stated a fact.
You presented a sermon.
One that did not include any physical description you said you would provide.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Does the bible describe what the devil/satan looks like
- Thread starter We Never Know
- Start date
I stated a fact.
You presented a sermon.
One that did not include any physical description you said you would provide.
Yokefellow
Active Member
I am saying that you appear to have chosen the body type of your next incarnation. What is done is done.
Does being passive aggressive with those that challenge you help advance you to salvation?
Yokefellow
Active Member
Does defending and 'liking' those that actually do make passive aggressive comments advance you to yours?
Not only was that comment rude and insulting, but it also insinuates that I am breaking the rules by 'Preaching/Proselytizing' which you agreed with. I obviously was not. Nevertheless, if all you are going to do is attack Christians all day, every day, while also defending others that do the same, then please let me know so I can go elsewhere. Seriously, this is a common pattern whenever you and I interact. I am absolutely sick of your constant nastiness towards me.
You appear to be confused. The only person that made a passive aggressive post here was you, and I don't recall liking that post or defending you.
I liked @McBell's post because he made a valid observation. And instead of addressing the observation, you dismissed him, and when called out on your dismissal and you claim, you failed to address the argument once again and instead became passive aggressive.
Yokefellow
Active Member
I completely disagree. You have made, and are continually making, false accusations against me.
And has Non Disclosure Agreements (NDA) with strippers and porn stars?
Yokefellow
Active Member
With all due respect, I was not 'presenting a sermon', which happens to be a rule violation.
Are you trying to get me in trouble?
McBell
Unbound
So then your claim of providing the verses that give physical descriptions of satan was what, exactly?
I flat out ask because so far it appears to be a huge steaming pile of bovine feces.
Yokefellow
Active Member
How much more clearer could I have made it?
How is that not a physical description?
Again...
Look at any Man. That is what Satan looks like.
Look at any Woman. That is what Mystery Babylon looks like.
McBell
Unbound
Except for the sermon you presented...
I have no problem with your sermon.
I mean, other than the fact it was offered up in place of the verses you claimed you would provide.
Yokefellow
Active Member
McBell
Unbound
Does this mean you are not going to present the verses that offer up a physical description?
The only verse I know that references his external appearance is this:
"And no wonder! Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light." 2 Corinthians 11:14
Representations of Satan in Christian art should be understood as symbolic.
Or we're just not interested in making everything about sex in some bizarre fashion. I mean, what the hell is all I can say to your personal interpretation of the Bible. That's a totally different religion than Christianity you're going on about.
Yokefellow
Active Member
Or we're just not interested in making everything about sex in some bizarre fashion. I mean, what the hell is all I can say to your personal interpretation of the Bible. That's a totally different religion than Christianity you're going on about.
No. That would be you making it about "sex in some bizarre fashion."
I clearly stated that the Bible is about Eugenics. It uses euphemism so that the information could be taught to children without being graphic.
Example:
"Where do babies come from?"
Answer...
Psalms 139:15
"My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth."
Interpretation taught to Child: Babies come from the lowest parts of the Earth.
Interpretation taught to Adults: Babies come from the Womb.
In other words, the 'lowest parts of the Earth' is a euphemism for the uterus. Christians are almost never taught the 'adult education' meaning.
Do people nowadays not get this? Is there anyone who still cares about keeping the minds of kids innocent, or is all about sex no matter what age?
And I am the bad guy here?
You're the one talking about wombs, semen, sperm and eggs (which would've been unknown to the Biblical authors) in this thread, not me. You're the one making it about sex with the Devil ejaculating into Babylon or whatever weirdness you were on about.
Also, Christianity is opposed to eugenics, so I'm not sure why you're using that term.
Please notice Ezekiel 28:13-17 because angelic cherub Satan is compared to precious jewels.
Please notice that in verse 21 Jesus is addressing his enemies the hate-filled Pharisees.
Thus, the kingdom of God would Not be within them, but Jesus was within their midst, among them.
It is Not until the next verse at Luke 17:22 that Jesus then addresses his disciples.
Jesus as King designate of God Kingdom, God's government for a thousand years - see Daniel 2:44-45; 7:18
So, the Kingdom of God is God's royal government in the hands of Christ Jesus for a thousand years - 1st Corinthians 15:24-26
We Never Know
No Slack
Neither is a unicorn or a leprechaun but they are described to what they look like