Scuba Pete
Le plongeur avec attitude...
It's good to see that your patience has grown. I'm truly impressed.This is little more than a rather silly ad hominem.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's good to see that your patience has grown. I'm truly impressed.This is little more than a rather silly ad hominem.
I agree. Oh no, again! LOLHonesty does require me to admit and declare that I believe it is just not possible to approach anything totally without bias. None of us are 100% neutral. We go in to everything we encounter with our imperfections as well as anything that one might consider "good."
Please cite your source. A prophet might claim from time to time to speak for God, but the scriptures never, ever make such a claim.
Why not both? Why does it have to be either/or? Can you have a painting of a sunset without the sunset's participation? Sure, it's a passive role, but you can still see the sunset in the picture since it inspired it in the first place. Take any holy writing, the OT, NT, the Koran, hey, even the Book of Mormon. Many of the images they give us are strange, because we don't share their cultural or historical perspective. We can still see 'God' written there. Sure, it might be a God that's like a Picasso to us, but it's still God.
Think about it... is this any less a watch?
Unlike most watches, that one is right at least twice a day.I agree that what people have seen and written of can direct another person to God.
The picture is not a watch. It is art. A watch is for knowing the time.
I agree!Unlike most watches, that one is right at least twice a day.
No matter whose scriptures you use, they are only a representation of God, based on their perspective. Just like art.
I Corinthians 13:12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. NIV
Ooooooh. You missed something in the reading of it. I am sure that no man is reliable for everlasting life. God is.God Himself did not write any part of the Bible with His own hand if that is what you are talking about. If you don't think any of it is reliable as God's word then we are arguing a moot point. Which prophets were reliable and which weren't? On what basis do you judge this?
I agree. Oh no, again! LOL
I think we are of the same religion. I was never Catholic but you are a Jesus believer and so am I!You have got to stop coing that! lol
I find I have more in common with people of other religions on here than I ever dreamed possible.
Ooooooh. You missed something in the reading of it. I am sure that no man is reliable for everlasting life. God is.
You do not follow what? YOU said, "how does a person know which prophet is reliable?. The Bible really does teach that we should not trust anyone to be reliable. If I wanted to I could find 100 scriptures to prove it. I don't want to.I don't follow.
I think we are of the same religion. I was never Catholic but you are a Jesus believer and so am I!
You do not follow what? YOU said, "how does a person know which prophet is reliable?. The Bible really does teach that we should not trust anyone to be reliable. If I wanted to I could find 100 scriptures to prove it. I don't want to.
Yes. I think there is a difference between knowing God and knowing what God says. I believe anyone can know God. But knowledge is for people who can bear it.So how do you know what to believe and what not to? I believe God reveals truth to us Himself through the Holy Spirit. Do you think the same?
Yes. I think there is a difference between knowing God and knowing what God says. I believe anyone can know God. But knowledge is for people who can bear it.
Thank you.You sound like dear St. Paul in this post. That is a compliment I don't give often or on a whim.
Rly? The scriptures are pretty clear about his.If you don't think any of it is reliable as God's word then we are arguing a moot point
We are often talking about the very same being, only from different perspectives. It's like the parable about the elephant:I find I have more in common with people of other religions on here than I ever dreamed possible.
A Jain version of the story says that six blind men were asked to determine what an elephant looked like by feeling different parts of the elephant's body. The blind man who feels a leg says the elephant is like a pillar; the one who feels the tail says the elephant is like a rope; the one who feels the trunk says the elephant is like a tree branch; the one who feels the ear says the elephant is like a hand fan; the one who feels the belly says the elephant is like a wall; and the one who feels the tusk says the elephant is like a solid pipe.
A king explains to them:
All of you are right. The reason every one of you is telling it differently is because each one of you touched the different part of the elephant. So, actually the elephant has all the features you mentioned.
Rly? The scriptures are pretty clear about his.
John 16:13 But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. NIV
Many Christians have deified the scriptures and have abandoned the Spirit.
Then we come to your use of the word "reliable". Reliable for what? It's a unique historical document that logs man's search for God.It doesn't claim to be the word of God, so you are in error to treat it as such. It doesn't claim to be inerrant, so you are in error to view it in that way. It's ironic that you don't actually believe the very book you claim to be the word of God. It doesn't matter what I 'think'... it matters what the scriptures say. Stop putting words in God's mouth.
We are often talking about the very same being, only from different perspectives. It's like the parable about the elephant:
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant