• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does the Left Take Any Responsibility for the Assassination Attempts on Trump?

an anarchist

Your local loco.
Is Mussolini or the crowd responsible for the end he met? Is the victim responsible for the bully's broken nose or the bully who pushed the victim to necessary self defense?
So to be clear, we are putting Trump on the same level as Mussolini?

I don’t necessarily agree or disagree, I am ill informed. Typically though, I view all politicians as authoritarians.

But the fact that everyone seems to be putting Trump on the same level as Hitler/Mussolini I believe can be seen as an inspiration to the assassination attempts.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
So to be clear, we are putting Trump on the same level as Mussolini?

I don’t necessarily agree or disagree, I am ill informed. Typically though, I view all politicians as authoritarians.

But the fact that everyone seems to be putting Trump on the same level as Hitler/Mussolini I believe can be seen as an inspiration to the assassination attempts.
He is not yet being put on the same level, what is being pointed out is the parallels in his behaviour and speech that are congruent with those dictators as they were amassing power.
 

an anarchist

Your local loco.
He is not yet being put on the same level, what is being pointed out is the parallels in his behaviour and speech that are congruent with those dictators as they were amassing power.
But can you see the thinking I’m trying to present though and I assume the OP is as well?

Lots of people are saying stuff along the lines of “Trump=Hitler” and no one would have a problem with Hitler being shot… if someone killed Hitler, they’d be a hero!…

With your reply you point out nuance with the comparison. But how many times is that nuance left out in discussion on Trump in general?
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
But can you see the thinking I’m trying to present though and I assume the OP is as well?

Lots of people are saying stuff along the lines of “Trump=Hitler” and no one would have a problem with Hitler being shot… if someone killed Hitler, they’d be a hero!…

With your reply you point out nuance with the comparison. But how many times is that nuance left out in discussion on Trump in general?
That there is a lack of nuanced thinking is a problem with humans in general, it is also generally not a problem when emotional arguments are not being propagated as Trump is doing. It also needs to be remembered that J.D. Vance was an early proponent of the Trump as Hitler argument for exactly the reason that his speech and actions were similar to the speech and actions of Hitler. Ultimately, Trump is at least partially responsible for the emotions that have driven some to target him.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I don’t necessarily agree or disagree, I am ill informed. Typically though, I view all politicians as authoritarians.
To think all politicians are authoritarians is in error. They aren't. Authoritarians are controlling, restrict and eliminate freedom amd don't take kindly to criticism. Politicians are shady but not even Nixon is comparable to those like the Kims or Putin when it comes to authoritarianism
So to be clear, we are putting Trump on the same level as Mussolini?
They are both fascist scum.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Those who triggered the lunatics that tried to assassinate him.

All indications are that Routh was triggered by:

- being turned away by the Ukrainian Army when he travelled there to fight in the war, and
- Trump pulling out of the disarmament treaty with Iran.

So who exactly do you think Trump should sue?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
All indications are that Routh was triggered by:

- being turned away by the Ukrainian Army when he travelled there to fight in the war, and
- Trump pulling out of the disarmament treaty with Iran.

So who exactly do you think Trump should sue?
That would be up to Trump to decide. Ask him.
 

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
A lot of the hate Trump receives can be traced to the hate Trump spews, honestly. There's a cost to being divisive when you are in the public eye, and few are more divisive than Trump
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
A lot of the hate Trump receives can be traced to the hate Trump spews, honestly. There's a cost to being divisive when you are in the public eye, and few are more divisive than Trump
And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make.
-The Beatles
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Trump has argued that presidential immunity should make him immune to any criminal prosecution while in office. The Supreme Court has ruled that the president has absolute immunity from illegal acts.

In his first term, a lot of his illegal orders were refused by subordinates on the grounds that they're illegal, but he's since announced his plan, if re-elected, to purge the civil service and replace these subordinates with people more willing to go along with his orders.

Trump's two impeachments showed that the House and Senate will vote along party lines, so Trump would never be removed from office as long as Republicans have a majority in the Senate... which it seems they'll likely maintain.

If someone thought it was likely that Trump would win the election and is concerned that a re-elected President Trump would behave illegally to infringe their rights, exactly what recourse would they have to protect those rights?
A minor correction. The Democrats control the Senate, but even with that control they cannot convict Trump since it takes a 2/3 super majority to convict. The House only takes a majority to impeach. But an impeachment is best thought of as an indictment. If the support does not exist in the Senate it will never happen.

That being said there was a huge difference between the two impeachment attempts because the Republicans controlled the Senate in the first one. That went nowhere and was especially ineffective because the Republicans held an obvious kangaroo court where they did not even allow any evidence against Trump to be presented. At least in the second one the hypocrisy of Republicans was made obvious.
 

Watchmen

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
You didn't answer my question. Which group did you intend to denote when you referred to "the Left"?

And why them?
"The Left" is self-explanatory. It requires no further clarification. I also have a separate thread regarding "the Right" taking responsibility. Again, these are nothing more than prompts and you are free to interpret and comment however you like (as many have already done).
 
Top