-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Donald Trump approves mass killing of Muslims !
- Thread starter Godobeyer
- Start date
I heard something which didn't quite match the thread's title.
It was about executing terrorists in a way to offend Muslims.
Btw, I don't approve.
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
I am not sure how one can misinterpret what he is saying without there being a language problem to begin with. He is NOT advocating the mass killing of Muslims in general, as your thread title implies. Clearly, he is talking about the Islamic State and similar groups. Do you have a problem with dealing with them so decisively?
That's was suggest could be true, when we "Muslims " did not fighting the terrorists.
Sultan Of Swing
Well-Known Member
No, that's not what he's saying at all.
I don't know about this story Trump is talking about, but just based on this video, this isn't approval of mass killings of Muslims, it involves killing captured terrorists.
YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
What, precisely, does not offend Muslims these days?
I don't understand your post.
But Muslims in general shouldn't worry so much about Trump.....since Hillary has been the far far deadlier of the two.
Democrats & lefties will insult him & anyone who favors him with wild histrionics & powerful sanctimony.
But what is the record?
Hillary voted to invade Iraq & to stay there.
She now threatens Iran.
Trump appears to be more self defense oriented, & less of a foreign adventurist.
Since 1990, we've had more Americans killed attacking mid-east countries than we've had killed by being attacked in domestic terrorism by Muslims.
http://www.statista.com/statistics/265977/us-wars-number-of-casualties/
Our methods stink.
Last edited:
I've never had one complain about my limericks.
And we have a huge Muslim population here
(which also gives us some of the best food in the country).
The problem with bullets dipped in pig blood is that is indeed
designed to offend. Would it be useful? I doubt it.
Is he did not knew that the Muslims fighting them ?
So misogyny and advocating banning the entrance of Muslims into his country mean nothing?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
I hope he'll be the president so he can send some American troops to destroy the terrorists and i think America
should support him to do this.
Did anyone say they mean nothing?
As for gender based bigotry, Hillary is quite vulnerable in that area.
But I weigh pros & cons by looking at the likely effects of the candidates.
In this way, Hillary strikes me as the greater threat to the economy & more civil liberties.
"More civil liberties" than an entire religious group's right to enter a country?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
What about the Muslim Americans, Should they leave?
I oppose his proposal to limit entry based upon religion too.
But there are many more civil liberties at stake, & there is also the question about which claims of his are likely to be implemented.
Religion based discrimination would face enormous political & legal hurdles.
I guarantee that he wouldn't be able to do it.
Good question. I guess one wouldn't put it past Trump to persecute American Muslims.
I wouldn't allow them to flee....it would destroy SE Michiganistan!
SpeaksForTheTrees
Well-Known Member
Gameower
