Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You certainly did read much into my post. You have **** poor standards if babies being born being white is a standard, if people dating based on the color of their skin is a standard, and if an entire group of people being miserable is a standard. I didn't say there is anything wrong with being white. No, rather, it's not a measurement of some sort of "standard," not unless you think KKK and Nazi standards are a good thing.So, I guess people should feel bad about these things? Haha, no. Take the pity party and walk, I'm not interested in what you're selling. You gain absolutely zero virtue points for doing the opposite of that. You also won't get any play from the white people must sulk and be ashamed of themselves angle from me. White people can be proud of their heritage, ancestors, culture, and race as well and only be interested in continuing that versus the crazy liberal family destroying values. I always find it funny that when a white man is proud of his race he's a racist, but a black person isn't. Again, just take that garbage to the curb... Being white is fine, liking to be with whites is fine...
He lost by nearly 3 million votes and has one of the lowest EC margins in history. 'Tis a fact.Trump's win was just like a giant veto for the entirety liberal talking points.
This isn't in the jokes section.Isn't it funny when even satire is taken seriously?
Gloating?Oh, gloating isn't finished? Thought we had grown up and moved on. Guess not.
I am having a hard time if this thread is a joke or not. I assumed it was, but the initial comments had me believe otherwise. Oopsie.Gloating?
I, for one, am mocking Trump's imperial attitude.
He lost by nearly 3 million votes and has one of the lowest EC margins in history. 'Tis a fact.
Perhaps it's a melange (a fancy mixture)?I am having a hard time if this thread is a joke or not. I assumed it was, but the initial comments had me believe otherwise. Oopsie.
Still it means it's hardly this "overwhelming defeat" many are harping on about. Pretty sad that Obama winning by 5 million votes and over 100 EC was supposed to be "no mandate," but a comfortable loosing margin with the people and a very slim EC margin is supposed to be this crushing defeat?Still.....
Still it means it's hardly this "overwhelming defeat" many are harping on about. Pretty sad that Obama winning by 5 million votes and over 100 EC was supposed to be "no mandate," but a comfortable loosing margin with the people and a very slim EC margin is supposed to be this crushing defeat?
He is the president, but I have no president. I don't believe in positioning myself beneath someone else just because of some title.I haven't been harping on it, I voted for Gary Johnson, I knew he would lose but I voted for him anyway out of principle. The fact still remains, he IS your President.
He is the president, but I have no president. I don't believe in positioning myself beneath someone else just because of some title.
He is the president, but I have no president. I don't believe in positioning myself beneath someone else just because of some title.
You certainly did read much into my post. You have **** poor standards if babies being born being white is a standard, if people dating based on the color of their skin is a standard, and if an entire group of people being miserable is a standard. I didn't say there is anything wrong with being white. No, rather, it's not a measurement of some sort of "standard," not unless you think KKK and Nazi standards are a good thing.
He lost by nearly 3 million votes and has one of the lowest EC margins in history. 'Tis a fact.
The "nuclear family" is one of the worst models of family ever to be conceived. It's about the least "family like" out of most concepts of family.destruction of the nuclear family,
Education models haven't been updated since society was industrialized, and they are literally designed like prisons (and often by people who do design prisons).Education has been turned into a propaganda machine making people more stupid than they went in.
I don't know of any rivers that have caught on fire in awhile. Smog isn't much of a problem either. The economy isn't the end-all be-all decider, nor should it. Like it or not, we need things like the EPA just to at least keep toxic pollution out of drinking water, and to be able to actually eat fresh fish that you catch.The EPA has become a dead weight on the economy, and nothing is freaking happening.
Didn't say everyone was, but they'd definitely be on board with the "whiteness" of it."Everyone that doesn't agree with me is in the KKK or a NAZI!"
You can keep telling yourself that, but a holding Senate by only a few seats (especially when the majority party is already challenging the President) and a President with such a slim margin of victory isn't "slamming the door" in anyone's face. If anything, it's the Republicans having the EC and redistricting on their side, something that saves their asses time and time again, and are two things that even a good chunk of Republicans don't like.Americans just slammed the door in their face, they didn't lose... they lost everything... The President, Senate, Congress, and the Supreme Court.
Interesting statement when studies seem to indicate quite the opposite unless you were making joke:The "nuclear family" is one of the worst models of family ever to be conceived. It's about the least "family like" out of most concepts of family.
Interesting statement when studies seem to indicate quite the opposite unless you were making joke:
Study: Children fare better in traditional mom-dad families - Washington Times
What is amazing to me is that the idea of stable two parent homes were in question in the first place and required further studies, it seems like common knowledge.
That pretty much say's it all.“Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents,” said Loren Marks, associate professor at the School of Human Ecology at Louisiana State University.
...
Mr. Marks’ paper had not been published yet and that he was not an expert on gay families.
...
Michael E. Lamb, a University of Cambridge scholar who has testified on behalf of gay parenting in same-sex marriage lawsuits, asserted in a study that neither family structure nor having one’s biological mother and father in the home is necessary for healthy child adjustment.
“[A]vailable evidence is sufficiently conclusive” that “children and adolescents being raised by same-sex parents are as likely to be well-adjusted as children and adolescents with heterosexual parents,” Mr. Lamb concluded in Applied Developmental Science in April.