Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Its clearly heading for debate territory. So mods, please move to debates if you feel it's time.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Please present the post number of your list.
And you might want to stop trying to dictate to me what I do and do not accept BEFORE I even get the chance to review what you claim to have presented.
Thank you for the post numbers.Source material from 27 and 29 cite some specifics.
He has done quite a bit. Could have gotten more done but obstructionism is a *****.Sad when you can't think of anything because he hasn't hasn't really done anything worth pointing out.
Where's those jobs?
Where's affordable health care?
Aside from 300 golf outings, and campaigning for Hillary........
That's clearly been more importaint.
Seems there are far to many people who believe the President of the USA has far more power than the position actually holds.He has done quite a bit. Could have gotten more done but obstructionism is a *****.
Lets look at his congressional allotted duties and power
Executive powers.
Head of executive branch. This deals with 2 main powers and duties. 1st is being Commander in Chief. He has done a lot with our Military. More than his predecessor I would argue much to my dismay. 2nd is making sure that laws by congress are enforced. An extension of this is his ability to write executive orders. As I recall he used that power far to often for conservative tastes.
Next is Judicial. He doesn't have direct judicial powers but has the power to make numerous different appointments with congressional approval. As I recall he has attempted to do this with great effort being opposed.
Next is his legislative powers. Pretty much none. All he does is veto bills he does not like. Which jobs bills did he veto that would have given us jobs?
Of course it won't. No one has accused you of being reasonable. Why would we expect you to start now?That left-right argument doesn't work with me. They're both statists, and they are two heads of the same snake to me.
Must you resort to ad hominems?Of course it won't. No one has accused you of being reasonable. Why would we expect you to start now?
Thank you for the post numbers.
My apologies.
I misunderstood your OP.
I got from the OP that you were whining about Obama because he is "neglecting" because he is "out campaigning for Hillary."
Your OP was not clear that you are whining about his whole term.
Carry on.
He's campaigning away for Hillary. Looks like job neglect to me.
The job travels with the president.He is still president last I heard. World affairs, domestic issues to contend with.
Why is he neglecting his presidential duties to instead go all out campaigning for Hillary.
That's her job right now. Not his.
Think about what you're saying for a moment. If you are going to expend an immense amount of energy and effort to build something, it is also prudent to make sure that the moment you're not there anymore, the next guy can't just tear it all down and start again. We pay insurance premiums, and buy maintenance contracts for exactly that reason. So all Obama is really doing is trying to ensure that what he worked so hard to build will have some chance of being maintained.My intention was not specifics per say, but the ever growing habit of politictions abandoning their duties of office when pressing issues still require their full attention.
Campaigning for Hillary seems rather inappropriate givin the current state of affairs both domestic and abroad.
It feels like a royal snub to the country as a whole and reflects poorly imv.
While I disagree vehemently with many of Obama's policies. It would be far more impressive and reflected positive on his character had he kept his nose to the grindstone until the very last day of his term as a working commited leader. That would have been impressive and inspiring to me.
Obama's campaigning for Hillary made me think of where the state of work ethics in politics lay, and where the sense of commitment and duty goes when embarking an office as importaint as the president, and any goverment office of note, because those are the offices people ought to look up to and rely on.
A long time ago. It seemed the office of president had that distinction of being held by hard working, smart, and committed people. (any party)
A symbolic icon reflecting those qualities that caused this country to grow and become the powerhouse in such a short time as compared to other countries.
Now it seems demoted now as being a status trophy passed time and time again for bragging rights, and who gets to hold it, flaunt it next without regard to the actual function it's intended and set up to be.
To go out and attempt to hand that "trophy" to one's successer before the terms and obligations are actually up, well.....
Not only for president, but any oath of office.
Think about what you're saying for a moment. If you are going to expend an immense amount of energy and effort to build something, it is also prudent to make sure that the moment you're not there anymore, the next guy can't just tear it all down and start again. We pay insurance premiums, and buy maintenance contracts for exactly that reason. So all Obama is really doing is trying to ensure that what he worked so hard to build will have some chance of being maintained.
I think it would be plain stupid not to do so.
You clearly have a strong bias here, so my input certainly won't add anything.Taxpayer money at work. Helping Hillary's campaign.
The job travels with the president.
BTW, why didn't you say much the same about congress?
BTW, why didn't you say the same about yourself?
Of all the hills to die on, you complain about something not at all unique to Obama or Democrat presidents and then shift the goal posts when you get called on the partisan bickering. I'm sensing a theme.
I think it's just tiring to see people that have a poor sense of priority and importance to a point where someone else's personal ambition like campaigning overides one's direct duties and responsibilities of the tasks at hand.You clearly have a strong bias here, so my input certainly won't add anything.
Think about what you're saying for a moment. If you are going to expend an immense amount of energy and effort to build something, it is also prudent to make sure that the moment you're not there anymore, the next guy can't just tear it all down and start again. We pay insurance premiums, and buy maintenance contracts for exactly that reason. So all Obama is really doing is trying to ensure that what he worked so hard to build will have some chance of being maintained.
I think it would be plain stupid not to do so.
Sure, I can see that. But I suppose it is hard to prove that by campaigning for his party, he is falling short elsewhere. I have no idea what his day in, day out, looks like. But, given that this is pretty typical for all presidents, I am willing to give him a pass here. But, that is my bias speaking, too.I think it's just tiring to see people that have a poor sense of priority and importance to a point where someone else's personal ambition like campaigning overides one's direct duties and responsibilities of the tasks at hand.
Sure, I can see that. But I suppose it is hard to prove that by campaigning for his party, he is falling short elsewhere. I have no idea what his day in, day out, looks like. But, given that this is pretty typical for all presidents, I am willing to give him a pass here. But, that is my bias speaking, too.
Nah, he has many other positives that his administration has taken care of.Guess that's Obama's legacy. Endorsing Hillary Clinton.