keevelish said:
sorry thinking that we don't think so alike anymore.
Keevelish, do not be too disappointed, as I believe it would be quite difficult, if not altogether impossible, for a Christian to find some other Christian who believes identically--hence why, in part, I believe
sola scriptura a myth.
keevelish said:
. . . I don't believe that there are prophets today. . . .
Many feel this way, usually also believing that there are no contemporary apostles. And seeing as how the numerous ones who refer to themselves as apostles and prophets are nearly always, not, I cannot fault you or anyone for such doubt.
However, I was not even referring to the
office of the prophet, so much as I was the supernatural Gift/Grace of prophetically speaking and writing--that which I believe 1 Cor. 14:1, 5 and 39 teaches should be common to every believer in Christ Jesus.[/QUOTE]
keevelish said:
I believe that our Bible is whole and complete and the only word from God to man--nothing else comes first or along with it, or else we would be like the Mormons and JWs.
I understand your view, Keevelish, however I think your comparison unfair. The groups you refer to assert that an additional and also needed written work, along with the Holy Bible, is a must. It is that upon which their religion is based, to a large part. I was in no way suggesting such. I would agree that no contemporary written work is equal to that which the orig. Apostles and disciples penned.
But the entire crux of the New Covenant is that, whereas Old Cov. man was not able to obey God, him attempting such via the dead letter of the law and self-righteous good works works of flesh; God established a Nerw Cov. which provided "manifold Graces," among them an indwelling S(s)pirit and laws written upon a new heart and mind, when combined are to be that primary guiding and enabling force--not some written Word, which can be altered, unavailable either physically or by way or illiteracy, misunderstood, etc., etc.
But agian, God was so very gracious to have us not have to depend upon just one "witness" for Truth, but He has provided many, that when combined will yield a more trustworthy source than any other in the world--but still by no means intended to be tangibly provable.
Keevelish, kindly refer to and meditate upon in the time to come, the basic Christian principle given in John 2:23-25. It is foundational to the Christian Faith and to the nature and methodology of God--a God who desires to remain intangible, accessible most only by the Faith He miraculously provides, "so that no flersh should glory in His Presence," so as to not yield that which perhaps He hates most (Prov. 6:16-17a).
keevelish said:
. . . why would he [God] tell us to search the scriptures in order to determine whether something is of God?
Because, per above, He does not intend that we should rely upon only one witness for Truth. For example, when we are instantly born-again on or after the age we are old enough to specifically, personally receive such a Grace from Heaven when it's offered, we should afterward have the witness of "His Spirit bearing witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God." But since, for example, no doubt many Islamic fundamentalist extremists also believe via some inner witness that they are god's children, we can deduce that such a witness, by itself, is insufficient to establish Truth in the matter.
But when such an inner witness is combined with the Holy Scriptures, them telling us that Christ Jesus is the only Way to God--.
Praise God! All glory to God and His Grace!
keevelish said:
You can certainly search the scriptures and see that many of the gifts of the holy spirit that were in use in the early church are no longer in use today. . . .
Well, I certainly respect your opinion, and do not wish to challenge it, but your statement is not coming across as persoanl the opinion it is but as asserted fact and Truth of God. I hope this is a misunderstanding on my part, for I have searched the Scriptures diligently for 15 years, half of that full time and in depth, and combined with that which I have pexperienced among hundres of congregations, I have concluded that the Gifts of the Holy Ghost as were manifested in the early first century church, are the same today--albeit widely abused, as they also were since the "beginning." But that is just my own personal opinion.
But such is a whole other topic and is drifting too far from the thread's starter.
keevelish said:
Just that it is difficult to find fundamentalists here, and I was hoping you were one.
Keevelish, I will bump up for you the thread of another, over on the Christian discussion section, entitled "Fundamentalism" by "Iris89." Thereupon you may find the postings of others who are also fundamentalist.
I, too, claim to be fundamentalist, and even moreso than most fundamentalists I have come to meet or otherwise know of. In fact, I take so very literal such commandments as to Love enemies and turn the other cheek, for instance, that I also find myself to be an Anabaptist. I do not believe that someone must be a
sola scriptura believer to be a fundamentalist.
But then I am many things, an interdenominational Christian--all glory to God. All facets of the Christian faith have something to contribute, no one group having a monopoly on Truth, "so that no man can boast" (notice that re-occurring theme of mine--and I assert God's).
We, virtually speaking, just have little-to-no idea how much our religious pride and arrogance and prejudices disqualifies us from the race that God set before us from the foundation of the world. It is perhaps the devil's greatest device to keep us in the dark--it's what got him, after all.
But thank you for the fellowship, and thank the Lord God--the latter the only worthy.
In His Grace of Love for you, keevelish, brotherjim