Subsidizing drug use rankles anyone who pays taxes,
or so you'd think.
Of course, if one does not give them their "snap" regardless.
they will still get drugs, and food. And not likely from
working two jobs. Society will probably lose more
than it could gain from a few taken off welfare.
Keeping the otherwise- restive pacified with snap n' dope
is in the best intetests of the self righteous (rich) lefties of
the upper east side and the redneck consruction company owner
in Tulsa.
One group gets righteous virtue, the other gets righteous
anger.
I dont much identify with rednecks anyway, and smug is
better than anger, right?
We dont have to actually mingle with the unwashed anyway,
right?