From
Forbes...
The bearded family has been a mega hit in the latest round of reality TV, following the recent trend of "Honey Boo-boo" style of the boonies stereotype family. But in the DD patriarch's latest interview with GQ magazine, he offered his personal opinions about homosexuality that has struck a nerve and drew a clear line down Americana's culture wars again. Freedom of speech to compare homosexuality to bestiality? Or hate speech?
Here is the quote from GQ as highlighted in the Forbes link above:
Why is this an issue? One reason is because big business is determining whether or not to drop Duck Dynasty from it's branding of items they're wishing to sell in all their box stores, a $400 million empire and partnership.
That's not chump change. As stated in the linked article, too, banking on personalities is a risk.
Is this the free market at work? Are conservative Christian perspectives on marriage and homosexuality being silenced? Do the remarks qualify as hate speech and should be censored?
Did A&E make the right decision to suspend Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson indefinitely?