• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
The actual center of the universe is the source.
The center of a child’s universe is always his or herself. However, it is very difficult to understand the workings of the universe with that model and very close to impossible to travel in it. Thankfully, the source provides constant analogous pictures as maps to locate the center. As we mature, we start to recognize the analogies and begin to discover at least the direction of the source.
Happy viewing.
We all have our personal centers - but we all are connected to everything else outside our centers - even far out in space.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
You are attempting to answer scientific questions as if you were a definitive authority in cosmology while contradicting actual experts in the field. Hopefully you realize that current scientific consensus holds far more weight and validity than individual opinions that contradict established science.

I really wish some people would stop so casually and readily dismissing decades of expert research and studies in favor of their unqualified, often biased opinions. The malignant effects of this cavalier lack of respect or appreciation for the authority and reliability of peer-reviewed science have never been so pronounced as during a global pandemic.

^ Easily the best post I've encountered in a long, long time!
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Debater Slayer said:
You are attempting to answer scientific questions as if you were a definitive authority in cosmology while contradicting actual experts in the field. Hopefully you realize that current scientific consensus holds far more weight and validity than individual opinions that contradict established science.

I really wish some people would stop so casually and readily dismissing decades of expert research and studies in favor of their unqualified, often biased opinions. The malignant effects of this cavalier lack of respect or appreciation for the authority and reliability of peer-reviewed science have never been so pronounced as during a global pandemic.
^ Easily the best post I've encountered in a long, long time!
I´m not sure you posted your comment in the correct thread.
 

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Science is chosen to be practiced.

As natural self presence human is not science.

Science in earth changes. Conversions stated that human science practice caused earth to become the caused centre of change for the universe.

Based on earth as a O cycle around sun leaving an earth irradiated space effect as not natural light gas mass burning. Natural light as gas cooled fixed bodies in same space condition.

Earth left a heated radiation trail that affected the ancient sun centre voiding vacuum status.

The sun blasting is a known history.

Cooling mass bodies historic in space sealed then erupted. As space movement cooled each body.

Suns big bang blasted as they cooled. Larger mass.

The centre the sun blasting caused the void vacuum to suck upon all bodies surrounding its body. Universe control. Natural control a sun mass.

Why planets did not cool to the same equals as planet gains are varied. Planet union.

Asteroids as colder stone was from the outer sun. To burning mass released had attacked all bodies as planets.

When science changed earth natural light heavens our central position the sun effect changed. That owned void vacuum status.

We became involved in sun mass origin ejection not originally projected at earth.

As wandering bodies.

What conditions a human scientist theories about claiming central origins and changed causes to earth versus sun central position.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Debater Slayer said:
You are attempting to answer scientific questions as if you were a definitive authority in cosmology while contradicting actual experts in the field. Hopefully you realize that current scientific consensus holds far more weight and validity than individual opinions that contradict established science.

I really wish some people would stop so casually and readily dismissing decades of expert research and studies in favor of their unqualified, often biased opinions. The malignant effects of this cavalier lack of respect or appreciation for the authority and reliability of peer-reviewed science have never been so pronounced as during a global pandemic.

I´m not sure you posted your comment in the correct thread.
I am.
 
Top