Exactly! At least I care enough to identify that problem and skip the ill regard of the biased.For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Exactly! At least I care enough to identify that problem and skip the ill regard of the biased.For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
The focal reason israel exists in palestine is that location.
The very settlers being sanctioned by US and UK are over the violence in the west bank and at the al aqsa (mount). Sure there are many issues and problems in palestine but to go over the last 50 yrs and the consistently reoccurring focal point is, that stupid hill (the mount).
'Status quo' has been in effect for quite some time but the rogue, the extremist, continue to attack the locals at that site, which kicks off violence.
That location is the central pursuit and always has been but few have actually done the look see to identify and find out what the problem is.
That's a great motivation. The next step is to learn enough to make that identification something other than worthless.Exactly! At least I care enough to identify that problem ...
Why? Anyone that actually cared would have already done the homework.This is a statement that would require a separate thread to explore and debate.
No mention of beliefs. UNESCO has already set the tone.Settler violence has never been limited to the Temple Mount, and I don't think the decades-long struggle can be reduced to what any group or groups believe about that specific site.
Agreed. IDF attacking the unarmed civilians should be focal on what to stop.Either way, though, this thread is about the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty and the IDF's attack on Rafah, not about the Temple Mount. Let's please stay on topic.
Stay on topic. What is worthless is going on a tangent with someone that actually does not care.That's a great motivation. The next step is to learn enough to make that identification something other than worthless.
huh?This will no doubt fall on deaf ears, but you would truly benefit from investing the considerable time required to read Sachar's
A History of Israel: From the Rise of Zionism to Our Time.
This question may well drag us further off topic, but do you think the treaty is truly at risk and, if so, what might Egypt do with its Gazan border?Either way, though, this thread is about the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty and the attack on Rafah, not about the Temple Mount. Let's please stay on topic.
Maybe annex the land between the river to the sea? Perhaps turn Jerusalem into an amusement park.This question may well drag us further off topic, but do you think the treaty is truly at risk and, if so, what might Egypt do with its Gazan border?
do you think the treaty is truly at risk and, if so, what might Egypt do with its Gazan border?
This question may well drag us further off topic, but do you think the treaty is truly at risk and, if so, what might Egypt do with its Gazan border?
Minister of Foreign Affairs Sameh Shoukry promised that Egypt would adhere to the 1979 peace treaty as long it remains reciprocal, dismissing reports from unofficial sources it was considering suspending the agreement over developments in Gaza.
Shoukry made his remarks during a press conference with Slovenia’s Minister of Foreign and European Affairs Tanja Fajon.
He stressed that Egypt has upheld its peace treaty with Israel for the past 40 years, serving as the foundation for diplomatic relations between the two nations.
Shoukry stated that Egypt is working strenuously to reach an agreement between Israel and Hamas to facilitate the exchange of detainees between both sides and ensure the entry of humanitarian aid into the strip.
On Sunday, AP cited two Egyptian officials and a Western diplomat as saying that Egypt had threatened to suspend the peace treaty if Israel expanded its offensive into the densely populated city of Rafah on the border with Egypt.
Shoukry also addressed reporting by Al-Arabiya that claimed Egypt warned Israel that it would “review and downgrade the diplomatic relations” if Tel Aviv storms Rafah.
He did not confirm or deny Al-Arabiya’s reporting, but did express that he was unaware of the sources cited by the Saudi news channel.
Though no expert, I've always suspected that, privately, Egypt is far more concerned about the Muslim Brother, and views Israel as a convenience so long as it doesn't completely destabilize the neighborhood. As such, much of its pronouncements are to a great extent performative.Short of a war with Israel—which, as I said, I don't think will happen—I think the changes along the border will mainly be focused on preventing a mass crossing by Palestinians into Egypt.
But I could certainly be wrong. (I really need to find some good sources on Egypt and Jordan.)
Or they could just sell them tanks to HAMAS and send in all the supplies that the people of gaza need for humanitarian aid?I think that while there might be a low probability of the treaty's getting suspended or annulled, there are many factors that I can get into later that make the treaty much more likely to stand than go in that direction.
Also, there's this:
As for the Gazan border, Egypt has fortified it:
Egypt deploys over 40 tanks to enhance border security in Rafah as war rages on - Egypt Independent
Security sources announced that Egypt has dispatched up to 40 tanks and armored personnel carriers to North Sinai during the past two weeks in order to enhance security on the border with Gaza.www.egyptindependent.com
Short of a war with Israel—which, as I said, I don't think will happen—I think the changes along the border will mainly be focused on preventing a mass crossing by Palestinians into Egypt.
Or they could just sell them tanks to HAMAS and send in all the supplies that the people of gaza need for humanitarian aid?
If the border of gaza is palestine, then there is no argument. But if israel considers it a crossing of borders, or that egypt is not allowed to open up that crossing, then each will have that proof positive, that concentration camp GAZA is 100% an israelis creation and they are committing an atrocity that is so horrid, that the term 'concentration camp' will forever be describing GAZA and the atrocities that israel has committed.
Then reparations for the victims and their families. Palestinians can seek israel as their homeland and have the whole of the UN and NATO siding with them. Look for UN Res. 181 (b). The 'will of god'
Though no expert, I've always suspected that, privately, Egypt is far more concerned about the Muslim Brother, and views Israel as a convenience so long as it doesn't completely destabilize the neighborhood. As such, much of its pronouncements are to a great extent performative.
But I could certainly be wrong. (I really need to find some good sources on Egypt and Jordan.)
I see that and likewise, i replied with sarcasm. I could never support putting more weapons into the divide, no matter the side.I wasn't posting to express whether I agree or disagree with what is happening on the border; I was just stating what I think is happening or likely to happen. I don't discuss Egyptian politics on RF, hence my posting a summary of the situation (as I understand it) without offering any personal opinions on the picture that I see.
Like Egypt has been threatening this accord by turning a blind eye to Gazan smuggling.
And you even know that israel controls that concentration camp from all sides.Which is why I think Israel will eventually close the Rafah Gate.
Disgusting. Have you ever been to a concentration camp?And you even know that israel controls that concentration camp from all sides.
Because it is an israeli creation.
When will you judge israel for their crimes?