Abortions Exempted From Elective Surgery Ban in Massachusetts
Abortions Exempted From Elective Surgery Ban in Massachusetts | NewBostonPost
Abortions Exempted From Elective Surgery Ban in Massachusetts | NewBostonPost
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Elective surgery is banned unless... it is for abortion
- Thread starter Shaul
- Start date
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
If it is elective, otherwise no.
Would rather people have access to abortion than get stuck with the medical cost in an international medical emergency where emergency hospital access is limited and emergency situations can happen any time.
Us mortality for pregnant and postpartum women is crazy high already. Far and above other countries.
What makes a surgery "elective" is the ability to postpone it without adverse
consequences. Abortion does have a limited window of opportunity, after
which the malady (birth) happens. To deny the surgery is to deny the right.
So it's not elective as a boob job, tummy tuck, pec implant,or face lift are.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
True. I hadn't thought those details out to that degree.
I'm all about the abortion.
I know so many tragedies, ie, people
whose mothers should've had the procedure.
Cooky
Veteran Member
I never knew you were so pro-abortion.
As I've oft said....
I'm not merely pro-choice...I'm pro-abortion.
Cooky
Veteran Member
Did you read this linked article? Some of the other procedures, such as having skin lesions removed, could cause a person’s death if not done.
No, just when desired (by the mother).Yikes... Not for every pregnancy I hope.
I didn't read the article.
If someone has a potentially deadly skin lesion, &
time is of the essence, wouldn't that be non-elective?
Cooky
Veteran Member
In my view, it's an intrusion on life by modern technologies. Something unnatural -so I have no interest in supporting it in any way. But that's just my opinion on the matter.
"Natural" & "unnatural" are highly subjective things,
very often driven by religious myths. I give them no
weight in this matter.
Hell, surgery, anesthesia, & sterile operating rooms
are "unnatural". You wouldn't do without those, eh.
Also cars, computers, internet, TV, air conditioning,
electric power......I'm starting to really like unnatural.
dfnj
Well-Known Member
Now after you instigated endless bickering with this thread are you just sitting back eating some popcorn watching what you have accomplished?
Cooky
Veteran Member
Those things are fine. They're positive things. But abortion just feels wrong. For whatever reason, it seems negative.
Meanwhile in Ohio the Attorney General is threatening to prosecute abortion clinics that violate its ban on elective surgeries which, in that state, does include abortions.
Capitol Insider: Yost orders clinics to stop 'non-essential and elective' surgical abortions
Capitol Insider: Yost orders clinics to stop 'non-essential and elective' surgical abortions
According to the article removal of skin lesions is elective surgery.
