So are you arguing against the banning any “elective” surgeries?A short, simple, outpatient procedure involving no hospitalization is not going to unduly impact the treatment of Covid 19 victims.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So are you arguing against the banning any “elective” surgeries?A short, simple, outpatient procedure involving no hospitalization is not going to unduly impact the treatment of Covid 19 victims.
Is it less “non-elective” than a hip or knee joint replacement surgery? Those are banned as “elective” too.An abortion is no more elective surgery than eye glasses are cosmetic.
It is more non-elective.Is it less “non-elective” than a hip or knee joint replacement surgery? Those are banned as “elective” too.
Read the article.
I can understand that.Those things are fine. They're positive things. But abortion just feels wrong. For whatever reason, it seems negative.
Could it be that some lesions are less elective than others?According to the article removal of skin lesions is elective surgery.
Would you object to it if it used older technology? Abortions are nothing new, though safe abortions are.In my view, it's an intrusion on life by modern technologies. Something unnatural -so I have no interest in supporting it in any way. But that's just my opinion on the matter.
What about the misery and ruined lives caused by unwanted children?Those things are fine. They're positive things. But abortion just feels wrong. For whatever reason, it seems negative.
So are you arguing against the banning any “elective” surgeries?
The point of the ban is to free resources needed to deal with the current pandemic. If a procedure isn't impeding the treatment of seriously ill patients I see no harm in it.So are you arguing against the banning any “elective” surgeries?
My glasses are unnatural, but I like having clear vision so I'll keep wearing them. Also, to say I have cadaver tissue in my, that would get me accused of witchcraft and necromancy in some places and times it's so unnatural.In my view, it's an intrusion on life by modern technologies. Something unnatural -so I have no interest in supporting it in any way. But that's just my opinion on the matter.
What about the misery and ruined lives caused by unwanted children?
If there's no such thing, then how can it be a matter of perspective?There's no such thing. It's all a matter of perspective.
Would you object to it if it used older technology? Abortions are nothing new, though safe abortions are.
What about other old methods like exposure? These were once common.
If there's no such thing, then how can it be a matter of perspective?
I take it there is no such a thing as an actual subjective opinion?Simple, there is no such thing as an actual "ruined" life. That's a subjective opinion.
How can you say that? A young girl forced into a life of poverty and public assistance. Plans for college or high school graduation abandoned. Prospects of a good job or career gone?There's no such thing. It's all a matter of perspective.
In my view, it's an intrusion on life by modern technologies. Something unnatural
How can you say that? A young girl forced into a life of poverty and public assistance. Plans for college or high school graduation abandoned. Prospects of a good job or career gone?
And what about prospects for the child? Poverty breeds poverty. The chances of a child of the underclass bettering himself are not good. The chances of him ending up in prison, on the other hand, are considerably better.
What is "natural" (among humans and other animals) is simply leaving weak or unwanted babies to die. Modern concepts of human rights are artificial.
"Natural" doesn't necessarily mean good or better.
I take it there is no such a thing as an actual subjective opinion?