• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ends in 50 Years

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
The World as we know it ends in 50 years. Complete and total annihilation.

Or so some say.

If that's true, what do we/you do?
Give up? Go with the flow? Create Chaos?
just going to wait for the next prediction of the world ending to see if that gives us more time...after the next prediction, repeat....just going to wait for the next prediction of the world ending to see if that gives us more time...and so on
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Given the timeframe of Brahma's life, over 311 trillion years, we don't need to worry. Even when the universe disappears, pralaya, there's more universes. We'll just move into a new universe and continue the adventure.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
The World as we know it ends in 50 years. Complete and total annihilation.

Or so some say.

If that's true, what do we/you do?
Give up? Go with the flow? Create Chaos?

Ecological overshoot is on pace to destroy society sometime in the coming decades. Does that constitute the world as we know it ending? It does for me. If we devolve to a mad-max world, I'd say it's ended.

What we do is come to understand and accept what ecological overshoot means, stop buying into the deadly myth of endless economic growth, come to understand the true, long-term ecological costs of our current lifestyles, and start modifying our behaviors accordingly.

Here's an example: We MUST stop population growth. To do that we MUST improve education for ALL women and girls and we MUST provide them all with free birth control technology.
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
The Andromeda galaxy is heading our way.
Yup yup. Will our two galaxies merge? Will they slip past each other? I think the predicted likelihood and consensus is on the former.
How different the night sky will look in 3 billion years, when they do, begin to merge.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
In certain regions yes, it's only immigration that keeps the rate of replacement above the death rate in many EU nations. China is experiencing a demographic and thus imminent economic crisis owing to its strict one child policies of the past.

Another way in which we MUST shift our thinking is to recognize that the claim "economies must grow to be healthy" is a myth, and a deadly one.

We need population control across the board. We need it in the West, we need it in Asia, we need it throughout the 3rd world.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
Correct, gravity is a bit of a bind though.
I'm not so sure about that. Stars are light years apart.

While the Andromeda Galaxy contains about 1 trillion (1012) stars and the Milky Way contains about 300 billion (3×1011), the chance of even two stars colliding is negligible because of the huge distances between the stars. For example, the nearest star to the Earth after the Sun is Proxima Centauri, about 4.2 light-years (4.0×1013 km; 2.5×1013 mi) or 30 million (3×107) solar diameters away.​
To visualize that scale, if the Sun were a ping-pong ball, Proxima Centauri would be a pea about 1,100 km (680 mi) away, and the Milky Way would be about 30 million km (19 million mi) wide. Although stars are more common near the centers of each galaxy, the average distance between stars is still 160 billion (1.6×1011) km (100 billion mi). That is analogous to one ping-pong ball every 3.2 km (2 mi). Thus, it is extremely unlikely that any two stars from the merging galaxies would collide.[6]
While each galaxy's supermassive black hole will converge, it's star collisions are unlikely.
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
Another way in which we MUST shift our thinking is to recognize that the claim "economies must grow to be healthy" is a myth, and a deadly one.
I agree, to a degree. I do think we can grow economies, without growing the population. With increasing automation and continuing developments in AI and Robotics, to accelerate production and with other emerging technologies like fusion energy and genetic modification, we can, at the same time, minimize our impact on the global ecology.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I'm not so sure about that. Stars are light years apart.

While the Andromeda Galaxy contains about 1 trillion (1012) stars and the Milky Way contains about 300 billion (3×1011), the chance of even two stars colliding is negligible because of the huge distances between the stars. For example, the nearest star to the Earth after the Sun is Proxima Centauri, about 4.2 light-years (4.0×1013 km; 2.5×1013 mi) or 30 million (3×107) solar diameters away.​
To visualize that scale, if the Sun were a ping-pong ball, Proxima Centauri would be a pea about 1,100 km (680 mi) away, and the Milky Way would be about 30 million km (19 million mi) wide. Although stars are more common near the centers of each galaxy, the average distance between stars is still 160 billion (1.6×1011) km (100 billion mi). That is analogous to one ping-pong ball every 3.2 km (2 mi). Thus, it is extremely unlikely that any two stars from the merging galaxies would collide.[6]
While each galaxy's supermassive black hole will converge, it's star collisions are unlikely.


Yes, i agree with the distance but the effect of gravity gravity is infinite on the inverse square rule. Very little will collide but just about everything will be effected by gravitational forces.
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
Yes, i agree with the distance but the effect of gravity gravity is infinite on the inverse square rule. Very little will collide but just about everything will be effected by gravitational forces.
So yes, who knows what a merger would bring to the orbit of the Sun itself around the galactic center? Well a powerful AI run computer simulation might have some idea!
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Pretty unfair. We're just cruising along out there minding our own business, and Andromeda just comes up and runs us down. :(

How does the Triangulum Galaxy squeak by unscathed?

Yes, that Andromeda is something of a big bully barging into innocent galaxies all the time. And old Tri-glum (my nickname for him), I'll ask next time i see him ;-)
 

Little Dragon

Well-Known Member
That's if the our sun isn't one of the unfortunate stars that is cast out into intergalactic space. :oops:
Of course by then, 3 -7 billion years, our sun will be a cooling red dwarf, and our planet would have been roasted dry during the red giant phase of our sun due to start some 500 million years from now? (I think)

We'd be an old shriveled up has been, ejected into deep intergalactic space...like a celebrity past their prime.
 
Top