01-need to see another photo (of the same guy)
02-yes
03-leaning towards yes. but need to see another picture/photo.
04-yes
05-no
06-leaning towards yes, but need to see another photo
07-no
08-no
09-no
10-yes
11-no
12-no
13-need to see another photo
14-leaning to yes, but need to see another photo
15-the middle guy
Not terribly impressive, Eselam, but quite instructive. The numbers do NOT lie.
With the exception of #14, who is a personal friend of mine, taken when he was 16, ALL of the men shown are gay.
So to recap, you scored:
23.53% correct (4=YES)
11.76% sort of correct (2=YES, Maybe)
11.76% Unknown (2=Unknown) (Counted as wrong)
52.94% incorrect (8=No and 1=wrong)
99.99% Total; 17 images.
From this simple study you have shown to be wrong
most of the time and are actually right on the money slightly higher than a third of the time (and that is beefed up with your "maybe's") otherwise your accuracy rate falls to
less than a quarter of the time.
Breakdown by image.
Image 1 is Billy Bean, famous American Baseball Star
Image 2 is Michaelangeo
Image 3 is Leonardo da Vinci
Image 4 is John Amaechi, famous NBA star
Image 5 is Ari Gold, dancer/singer
Image 6 is Rufus Wainwright, singer/songwriter
Image 7 is Barney Frank, Democratic Representative for Massachusetts's 4th congressional district
Image 8 is Lord Peter Mandelson, famous British Politician
Image 9 is Long John Baldry, moderately famous English Singer/Songwriter
Image 10 is Johnny Mathis (I didn't know he was gay, quite honestly)
Image 11 is the leader of the legendary band
Frankie Goes to Hollywood
Image 12 is the rather stunning Josh Zuckerman, actor (If anyone has his cell number, PLEASE send me a PM!!!)
Image 13 a young teen porn star, sorry don't know his name
Image 14 is a good friend of mine I have known since he was in high school. He is definitely NOT gay.
Image 15 was a trick image. It was taken from a porno series available on the net and is the first image in the rather explicit series. I could send you the URL if you don't believe me, lol.
Do we need much more "proof", Eselam?