• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ethical to breed animals for its only purpose to be eaten?

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
What an ancient thread! Newbies really need to pay attention to thread dates before posting in them!
Lol. I think it's the trend of the generation to "remaster" retro threads.

Or,

there is a notable lack of creativity and as a result preferences lean toward lazy thinking because it's just to hard to come up with fresh subjects.

Eh....
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Wow, this thread is a real old timer!
Breeding flora & fauna for the single purpose of eating them is not just ethical, it's also efficient & tasty.
A pretty broad denial of moral consideration, Revoltingest. On what do you base your ideas of moral obligation, if a pig and potato be morally equivalent?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
A pretty broad denial of moral consideration, Revoltingest. On what do you base your ideas of moral obligation, if a pig and potato be morally equivalent?
I deny nothing!
Moral obligations will vary from person to person.
I'm fine with eating animals bred to please my palate.
But I want them treated humanely & prepared wonderfully.

What is this based upon?
As with everyone else holding forth upon their values, mine are based upon personal values.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
If a race of little green men landed and began breeding humans for food, would you have any problem with that?
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
So the morality of the act depends on the relative level of technology?
How is this not might-makes-right?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
So the morality of the act depends on the relative level of technology?
How is this not might-makes-right?
Morality isn't something which has absolute or objective origins.
It's typically a consensus....an agreement about what's moral & what isn't.
What I say is moral is only the opinion (value) of those of us who agree it is.
Others will have other opinions. They're no more right or wrong than I am.

Parenthetical aside.....
This subjectivity is often presented to me by believers to argue that there must be a supreme
being.....one who can create an absolute & inerrant morality which gives comfort.
I don't buy it. Comfort doesn't confer truth.
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
Morality isn't something which has absolute or objective origins.
It's typically a consensus....an agreement about what's moral & what isn't.
What I say is moral is only the opinion (value) of those of us who agree it is.
If child rape was agreed upon by all in a community to be moral, would it be moral to rape children?
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Anyone see Modest Mouse's music video for float on? it made me realize how barbaric it was. im gradually getting off eating meat. I find it hypocritical that we love animals and all, yet we eat them.

is it right? I would appriciate your thoughts!
Do you love plants?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If child rape was agreed upon by all in a community to be moral, would it be moral to rape children?
To those people who believe that, it would be moral.
(Unfortunately, there are some people like that. The subjectivity of it notwithstanding, I'd like to see'm in prison the rest of their lives.)
Sure, sure....it seem so incredibly obvious to us that child rape is immoral.
And we understand that we can reason this from shared premises (our values).
But ultimately, we've no objective basis for saying our values are absolutely true.
 
Top