• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

European Union: the lounge-loving and elitist Left has been defeated

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
You are not Europe and neither am I. The difference seems to be that only one of us knows that. ;)
Yes.
But I also said that the Russophobic nonsense and the anti-Putin propaganda would unleash Nationalism and Populism all over Europe...and you guys didn't believe me. ;)
Didn't you see what has just happened in France?
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
They could probably accomplish the same thing without nationalism. Nationalism can be dangerous.
Honestly I suspect that it's some banking élites overseas who hired the Nazis in the forties. They hired them to conquer and undo the Soviet Union.

 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Yes, it is. But not this one. Not the American Democratic Party, for example.

No, the left is for the people, including the American Democratic party. The big problem is the fact that the right has successfully convinced people like you that they are actually for the people, while "the left" is not. Meanwhile the right work for the billionaires and keep rigging the system more and more for them.
Populism literally means "of the people".
Right-wing populism isn't actually for the people, though. It just uses that to gain power.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes, it is. But not this one. Not the American Democratic Party, for example.

Populism literally means "of the people".

I don't think the U.S. Democratic Party can be considered "left wing." At one point, they had a preponderance of progressives and others of a leftish bent which might have made them seem more left than they are now (or were, prior to the 1920s and 30s). But they're not the party of FDR or JFK anymore. Not even close. (But neither is the GOP the party of Abraham Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt anymore. Not even close.)

Populism seems more a matter of "pleasing the mob." Although it could be a matter of "working the crowd" and being able to persuade the mob to go along with something. It's a matter of riling people up. It seems some people have a certain knack or ability along those lines.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Nationalism brings nations together.

No, nationalism does the exact opposite. By definition, it's about putting your own nation first.

Now European nations love each other because they understood that their common deadly enemy is the financial and banking élites.
Some commentator in my country said: this is vote of pure hatred. Against the banking and financial élites who push for WW3.

Except the "elites" love right-wing populism and nationalism. They're often behind it.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I don't think the U.S. Democratic Party can be considered "left wing." At one point, they had a preponderance of progressives and others of a leftish bent which might have made them seem more left than they are now (or were, prior to the 1920s and 30s). But they're not the party of FDR or JFK anymore. Not even close. (But neither is the GOP the party of Abraham Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt anymore. Not even close.)

Yeah, these days they're more centrist, even center-right. Most of them don't even support universal healthcare, which is still considered a "far left" idea here.

Populism seems more a matter of "pleasing the mob." Although it could be a matter of "working the crowd" and being able to persuade the mob to go along with something. It's a matter of riling people up. It seems some people have a certain knack or ability along those lines.

Exactly. It's not actually "for the people". It's more about using the people to gain power.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
It has zilch to do with Russia.
And everything to do with the anti-immigration sentiment that has been on the rise.
I remind you that your president refused to meet Zelenskyy when he visited South America.
:)
I hope you also know the reason why he (wisely) did that. https://tass.com/world/1719147

Maybe you don't understand that I don't side with the likes of Milei. I side with the likes of Lula.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Yes.
But I also said that the Russophobic nonsense and the anti-Putin propaganda would unleash Nationalism and Populism all over Europe...and you guys didn't believe me. ;)
Didn't you see what has just happened in France?

Russia invaded a sovereign country just because it wanted to take it over. The propaganda comes from the right and is pro-Putin.

In other words, the right is responsible for the propaganda as well as the nationalism and populism. They are selling false narratives to get people like you to buy in, and you're falling for it.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I think it's a natural outcome of "progressives" becoming extreme in the other direction.
The Democrats want to limit freedom of speech and gag all their political opponents but they call themselves "democratic".

It's like as if I were a prostitute and I chose "Immaculate Virgin" as nickname. :)
 
Top